Page 19 - JoFA_2022
P. 19
‘A risk-based methodology also
racy Harding, CPA, was on his way to work
and looking forward to completing an audit
facilitates effective supervision and
The was working on. But on the way in, he
heard a news report that changed the objective of
his day. review by adequately directing and
A local business was unexpectedly closing its
doors and happened to be a significant customer of reviewing areas of greater risk.’
Harding’s audit client. The plans for Harding’s day
had changed — he would be revisiting risks associ-
Maria Manasses, CPA, deputy chief auditor at Grant Thornton LLP and
ated with receivables and reassessing the allowance
chair of the ASB Risk Assessment Task Force
for bad debts.
“I recognized we’d have to assess the impact
on the audit,” recalled Harding, a principal with and at a reasonable cost for the benefit of timely
BerryDunn in Bangor, Maine, who is chair of the financial reporting to users.”
AICPA Auditing Standards Board (ASB). The following considerations can help audit
The last-minute change in plans illustrates that firms succeed in their risk assessment processes as
from the beginning of the audit until the very a new standard comes into force and a pandemic-
end, auditors need to be evaluating the risks in an fueled shift in risks takes hold.
engagement. A robust risk assessment is the key to
creating an audit plan that guides the direction and INTERNAL CONTROL PROVIDES INSIGHT
procedures performed during the audit, prompting SAS 145 clarifies that the overall understanding of About the
practitioners to spend their time in the right areas the entity’s system of internal control is achieved author
in the engagement. It also provides the impetus to through understanding, and evaluating certain Ken Tysiac is the
pivot when necessary, even when confronted with aspects of, each of the following components JofA’s editorial
new information on the day that an auditor’s report of the system of internal control (and perform- director. To
is to be issued. ing the related requirements to obtain such an comment on
In recognition of the foundational role of risk understanding): this article or to
assessments in the pursuit of quality in engage- ■ The control environment. suggest an idea
ments, the ASB in October issued Statement on ■ The entity’s risk assessment process. for another article,
Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 145, Understanding ■ The entity’s process to monitor the system of contact him at
the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the internal control. Kenneth.Tysiac@
Risks of Material Misstatement (see the sidebar ■ The information system and communication. aicpa-cima.com.
“New Risk Assessment Standard Has Focus on ■ Control activities.
Clarity”). The new standard is designed to address SAS 145 requires a deeper understanding and
an area that the peer review program has identified clearer articulation of the auditor’s evaluation of the
as challenging for auditors and has been a focus of design of controls.
the AICPA’s Enhancing Audit Quality initiative. An understanding of controls — and the system
SAS 145 does not fundamentally change the key of internal control — can provide a window into
concepts underpinning audit risk. Rather it clarifies potential fraud risks and gaps in internal control
and enhances certain aspects of the identification that could lead to the risk of a material misstate-
and assessment of the risks of material misstate- ment. Therefore, this understanding can inform the
ment to drive better risk assessment and, therefore, audit response.
enhance audit quality. “One of the legs of the fraud risk triangle is
“I like to call it spending your time where you opportunity,” Harding said, “and one of the ways
need to spend it, looking at and taking time to you can learn about opportunities is to understand
make sure that you put more audit effort in the where there may be inappropriate segregation of
areas that have greater risk, and reducing the time duties, for example, and you can only do that if you
spent in areas that you don’t have a lot of risk in,” get in there and get an understanding of controls.”
said Maria Manasses, CPA, deputy chief auditor
at Grant Thornton LLP in Downers Grove, Ill., NEW SIGNIFICANT RISK DEFINITION
and chair of the ASB Risk Assessment Task Force. Auditors will hopefully better understand which
“And it’s important to do that because an audit risks should be flagged as significant risks thanks
is performed within a reasonable period of time to a new definition that’s included in SAS 145.
journalofaccountancy.com January 2022 | 17

