Page 347 - JoFA_2022
P. 347

TAX / TECHNOLOGY





                                                      Price was far and away
         products, on a 1–5 scale, with 5 being the high-
         est — see the table “Overall Ratings”). Some
         of the highest marks respondents gave were for
                                                      named as the most
         Drake’s ease of updating and installation, how
         well it handled updates, and ease of e-filing, all
         4.8. Also scoring 4.8 was Lacerte’s ease of e-filing
                                                      frequent ‘dislike’ for four
         and ProSeries’s ease of updating and installation.
         The lowest average rating was for ATX’s integration
         with accounting and other software (2.9), although
                                                      products.
         integration tended to be rated lower across the
         board than other such features the survey asked
         about. Drake Tax users rated its integration with
         other software also a relatively low 3.1.
            Asked if they would recommend their software
         to someone starting a tax practice, 97% of Drake   feature was their number of forms and compre-
         Tax users said yes. The lowest percentage of users   hensiveness, at 54%. CCH Axcess Tax and CCH
         answering yes to that question was 61.7% of users   ProSystem fx stood out here, both with nearly 77%
         of CCH Axcess Tax. CCH Axcess Tax scored     of users liking their number of forms and compre-
         lower than the other major products on ease of   hensiveness, the highest percentages of “likes” for
         the update/installation process, ability to transfer   any feature of any of the products. CCH ProSystem
         data with returns, ease of e-filing, and ease of   fx was also a clear winner with 72.3% of users
         use generally.                               liking its accuracy, against an average for all major
                                                      products of 50%. On the other hand, Drake Tax
         LIKES AND DISLIKES                           users seldom chose number of forms and compre-
         Respondents were able to choose up to three out   hensiveness as a prized trait, at 25.3%.
         of 11 attributes they most liked and disliked in   Not shown in the tables are responses to a sepa-
         their tax software and could write in others (see the   rate but related question of whether the software
         tables “Top Likes” and “Top Dislikes”).      contained all necessary forms. The highest percent-
            For all major products combined, the best-liked   age answering yes were UltraTax CS users (91%),


         Technical support




                                                               All products  ATX  CCH Axcess Tax  CCH ProSystem fx  Drake Tax  Lacerte  ProSeries  UltraTax CS





          Did you need technical support?*                  76.5% 63.5% 79.0% 80.1% 83.9% 79.7% 61.4% 79.2%
          How easy was it to get?                            3.6   3.3   3.0    3.2   4.7   3.7   3.6    2.9
          How good was it?                                   3.7   3.5   3.3    3.5   4.5   3.8   3.7    3.3
          Received support by: †
             Phone                                          91.0% 86.3% 84.4% 86.4% 91.8% 95.2% 95.0% 91.8%
             Email                                          28.0% 31.5% 44.5% 39.2% 23.9% 17.6% 10.0% 34.2%
             Live chat/IM                                   30.0% 32.9% 59.4% 39.2% 14.1% 20.7% 24.3% 35.2%
             Other                                           3.3%  2.7%  5.5%   2.4%  1.6%  4.3%  5.0%   2.8%

          * Percentage of each product’s users answering “yes.”
          † Percentage of those users who received support; multiple answers permitted.
          All other answers: Average rating on a 1–5 scale, with 5 being the best.



         30    |   Journal of Accountancy                                                                 August 2022
   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352