Page 524 - JoFA_2022
P. 524

A CPA firm planning to apply the new    reasonably rely on tools used in the performance
          standard first must consider whether the firm’s   of tax services.
          existing data protection efforts are reasonable.   SSTS Section 1.4. applies to a broad range of
          As explained in SSTS Section 1.3.6., factors   tools including but not limited to tax preparation
          including the impact of continuing technological   software, tax calculation tools, and tax research
          developments, member-specific factors such as the   tools. Members are allowed to reasonably rely on
          type of service being provided, and firm size are   tools as long as they use appropriate professional
          taken into account when considering whether a   judgment and professional care in selecting and
          plan is reasonable. For example, a sole practitioner   using that tool. For example, it would generally
          would not be expected to have a plan as complex   not be reasonable for a member to assume a tax
          as that of a 100-member firm but would be   return prepared using a standard tax compliance
          expected to take basic steps to protect taxpayer   software package was complete without reviewing
          data, which might include installing and using   the prepared tax return itself. The member should
          virus-scanning software, using VPN software, and   also employ a normal tax return review process,
          securing computers with a password. Also note   taking steps such as confirming that taxable
          that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, P.L. 106-102,   income computed by the tax return software
          establishes a requirement for tax preparers to   matches the expected taxable income from the
          implement an information security plan. The   taxpayer’s trial balance.
          AICPA has developed a sample template available   In the case of tools used for tax research, the
          to Tax Section members.                   member may not be able to confirm the accuracy
            Once members have verified they have taken   of a specific source as directly. Instead, the mem-
          reasonable efforts to protect taxpayer data, they   ber should consider the source of the research. For
          should consider whether additional steps are   example, documentation obtained from a promi-
          advisable. For example, members may choose to   nent subscription-based tax research software ven-
          put in place a plan to ensure unnecessary client   dor may have more weight than opinion articles
          data is not maintained, mask personally iden-  from independent internet sources. The standard
          tifiable information where permissible, and/or   does not, however, prevent a member from using
          establish a training program around data protec-  an opinion article in developing a position; a
          tion measures.                            member should use professional judgment to
                                                    apply sound tax principles in applying the opinion
          SSTS 1.4., Reliance on Tools              put forward in that article.
            New standards:                            The task force believes the majority of mem-
            Section 1.4.3. A member should exercise ap-  bers already follow the proposed standard, exercis-
            propriate professional judgement and profes-  ing diligence in both the selection of tax tools and
            sional care when relying on a tool.     their use. This standard will assist those members
                                                    when working through an issue arising from soft-
            Section 1.4.4. A member may reasonably rely   ware errors. Although reliance on software alone
            on tools used in providing tax services to a   will not constitute an adequate defense, the task
            taxpayer. Use of the tool does not absolve the   force believes this standard establishing principles
            member of his or her professional obligations   for the reliance on tools will be overwhelmingly
            under AICPA or other applicable ethi-   beneficial to members (see, e.g., “Reliance on Tax
            cal standards.                          Software Does Not Let Taxpayer Off the Hook,”
                                                    Tax Insider, Aug. 3, 2017, discussing a Tax Court
            CPAs rely on technology to provide services   case where the taxpayer was denied relief when
          more today than at any point in history. That   asserting reliance on personal tax preparation
          trend will likely continue with the introduction   software).
          of artificial intelligence, data science, quantum   To implement this standard, firms should re-
          computers, and other developing technologies.   view their current tool selection process to ensure it
          However, tax professionals do not have written   meets the essence of the standard. For many widely
          standards allowing them to place a degree of   available and relied-upon tax software packages,
          reliance on these tools when providing services.   members may find that a basic review of a new
          The task force identified the need for a standard   software vendor’s offerings is sufficient to demon-
          that protects members by defining when they may   strate that reliance on the tool is appropriate.

          journalofaccountancy.com                                                             December 2022    |   33
   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529