Page 129 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 129
128 Section II: Intracranial Procedures
A Postoperative Considerations
Patients are recovered in an intensive care unit. A single dose of
mannitol is administered prior to anesthetic recovery and can be
repeated if necessary based on neurological signs. Patients are mon-
itored closely for evidence of increased intracranial pressure. Pain is
controlled with an opioid constant‐rate infusion. Typical patients
are discharged 48–72 hours postoperatively if their recovery is
uncomplicated. Antibiotic prophylaxis is continued while the
patient is in hospital and for 7 days following discharge.
Video clips to accompany this book can be found on
the companion website at:
www.wiley.com/go/shores/neurosurgery
References
1 Goldschmidt MH, Thrall DE. Benign bone tumors in the dog. In: Newton CD,
Nunamaker DM (eds) Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: JB
B Lippincott, 1985: 899–907.
2 Selmic LE, Lafferty MH, Kamstock DA et al. Outcome and prognostic factors for
osteosarcoma of the maxilla, mandible, or calvarium in dogs: 183 cases (1986–
2012). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;245:930–938.
3 Dernell WS, Straw RC, Cooper MF, Powers BE, Larue S, Withrow SJ. Multilobular
osteochondrosarcoma in 39 dogs: 1979–1993. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998;34:11–18.
4 Lipsitz D, Levitski RE, Berry WL. Magnetic resonance imaging features of multi-
lobular osteochondrosarcoma in 3 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:14–19.
5 Hathcock JT, Newton JC. Computed tomographic characteristics of multilobular
tumor of bone involving the cranium in 7 dogs and zygomatic arch in 2 dogs. Vet
Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:214–217.
6 Kim H, Nakaichi M, Itamoto K, Taura Y. Primary chondrosarcoma in the skull of a
dog. J Vet Sci 2007;8:99–101.
7 Johnson KA, Cooley AJ, Darien DL. Zygomatic osteoma with atypical heterogene-
ity in a dog. J Comp Pathol 1996;114:199–203.
8 Kealy JK, McAllister H, Graham JP. The skull and vertebral column. In: Diagnostic
Radiology and Ultrasonography of the Dog and Cat. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier,
2010: 447–543.
9 Jorda M, Rey L, Hanly A, Ganjei‐Azar P. Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of bone.
Cancer Cytopathol 2000;90:47–54.
10 Sabel MS, Diehl KM, Chang AE. Principles of surgical therapy in oncology. In:
Chang AE, Hayes DF, Pass HI et al. (eds) Oncology: An Evidence‐Based Approach.
Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006: 58–72.
11 Mohana R, Faisham W, Zulmi W, Nawfar AS, Effat O, Salzihan MS. The incidence of
malignant infiltration in the biopsy tract of osteosarcoma. Malays Orthop J 2007;1:7–10.
12 Wadhwa N. Osteosarcoma: diagnostic dilemmas in histopathology and prognostic
factors. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:247–254.
13 Rozeman LB, Cleton‐Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PCW. Pathology of primary malig-
nant bone and cartilage tumours. Int Orthop 2006;30:437–444.
14 Kraus DH, Lanzieri CE, Wanamaker JR, Little JR, Lavertu P. Complementary use of
computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing skull base
lesions. Laryngoscope 1992;102:623–629.
Figure 13.15 Postoperative skull radiographs of the patient in Figure 13.13 15 Evans HE, de Lahunta A. Anatomy of the skeleton. In: Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog,
showing the position of the implant and providing a comparison for future 4th edn. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2013: 80–158.
evaluation. 16 Ström D, Holm S, Clemensson E, Haraldson T, Carlsson GE. Gross anatomy of the
craniomandibular joint and masticatory muscles of the dog. Arch Oral Biol
1988;33:597–604.
17 Tomlinson J, Presnell KR. Use of the temporalis muscle flap in the dog. Vet Surg
1981;10:77–79.
patients. The screw heads are specific to the mesh selected. 18 de Lahunta A, Glass E, Kent M. Neuroanatomy gross description and atlas of trans-
Depending on the size of the defect, six to eight screws are typi- verse sections and magnetic resonance images. In: Veterinary Neuroanatomy and
Clinical Neurology, 4th edn. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2015: 6–45.
cally used to ensure adequate fixation. Following fixation of the 19 Boston SE. Craniectomy and orbitectomy in dogs and cats. Can Vet J 2010;51:537–540.
mesh, any remaining temporalis muscle or fascia is secured to 20 Bryant KJ, Steinberg H, McAnulty JF. Cranioplasty by means of molded polymeth-
cover the implant as much as possible and the subcutaneous tissue ylmethacrylate prosthetic reconstruction after radical excision of neoplasms of the
and skin are closed in routine fashion (Figure 13.14). Postoperative skull in 2 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;233:67–72.
skull radiographs and/or CT are performed as a reference point 21 Bordelon JT, Rochat MC. Use of a titanium mesh for cranioplasty following radical
rostrotentorial craniectomy to remove an ossifying fibroma in a dog. J Am Vet Med
for future monitoring (Figure 13.15). Assoc 2007;231:1692–1695.