Page 763 - Equine Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction, 2nd Edition
P. 763

738                                        CHAPTER 4



  VetBooks.ir  Management                                 extraction of these teeth to improve performance is
                                                          frequently not justified. The recent practice of exces-
           In symptomatic cases surgical excision of the
           lesion including its entire cystic lining is effective.
                                                          and 206 to create ‘bit seats’ is said to be impaired
           Recurrence is rare following complete removal of   sive rasping of the buccorostral aspects of the 106
           the cyst lining, but if remnants remain, redevelop-  by the presence of wolf teeth and this has also been
           ment of a secretory and discharging epithelial-lined   cited as a reason for their removal. Since the scien-
           sinus tract can occur.                         tific merit of this practice is unclear it remains to be
                                                          seen whether this justifies extraction of the teeth.
           RUDIMENTARY TEETH (‘WOLF TEETH’)               Where  the  teeth  are  mandibular,  are  prominent,
                                                          erupting in a rostral or buccal position, and when
           Definition/overview                            there is clear indication of pain over an unerupted
           The presence of vestigial brachydont 1  premolars   tooth or there is bit impingement, it is appropriate
                                             st
           (Fig. 4.34).                                   to extract the whole vestigial tooth under standing
                                                          chemical restraint with local analgesia. Entrapment
           Aetiology/pathophysiology                      of the buccal mucosa between the bit and the wolf
           The 1  upper premolar (Triadan 105, 205) is com-  tooth or rostrolateral aspect of the 2  premolar can
                st
                                                                                         nd
           monly present in both male and female horses. These   result in discomfort; consequently a lack of respon-
           vestigial ‘wolf teeth’ are present in an   estimated   siveness on the bridle is attributed to the presence of
           20–60% of horses according to different studies.   the wolf tooth whether implicated or not.
           They are usually in contact with 106 and 206 and
           are rarely in occlusion. More occasionally, molarised  Clinical presentation/diagnosis
           105s and 205s are present (Fig.  4.35). Traditional   Palpation of the rostral arcade will reveal the presence
           practice has been to remove the wolf teeth under   of erupted or subgingival wolf teeth. Radiography is
           standing chemical restraint and local analgesia.   advised in abnormally situated or extremely large
           Historically, reduced performance and bit sensitivity   teeth.
           have been attributed to discomfort associated with
           the impingement of the bit over the wolf teeth, with  Management
           little or no supportive data in most cases. Evidence   Wolf tooth removal is easily accomplished in the
           for the role of most normally situated vestigial   field.  Sedation of the  horse using  an  alpha-2  ago-
           wolf teeth is consistently elusive, suggesting that   nist such as detomidine, romifidine or xylazine




           4.34                                           4.35



















           Fig. 4.34  Specimen showing a normally positioned   Fig. 4.35  Wolf teeth occasionally can be large and
           wolf tooth (Triadan 205, arrow).               molarised with multiple pulp horns.
   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768