Page 494 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 494

460   Chapter 4


             3.  Barrett MF, Frisbie DD, King MR, et al. A review of how magnetic   29.  Denoix JM, Thibaud D, Riccio B. Tiludronate as a new therapeu-
               resonance imaging can aid in the case management of common   tic agent in the treatment of navicular disease: a double‐blind
                                                                    placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Equine Vet J 2003;35:407–413.
               pathological conditions of the equine foot. Equine  Vet Educ
  VetBooks.ir  4.  Baxter GM, Stashak  TS.  The foot. In  Adams and Stashak’s   30.  Dik KJ, van den Broek J. Role of navicular bone shape in the
               2017;29:683–692.
                                                                  pathogenesis of navicular disease: a radiological study. Equine Vet
                                                                  J 1995;27:390–393.
               Lameness in Horses, 6th ed. Baxter GM, ed.  Wiley‐Blackwell,
               Ames, IA, 2011;475–535.
             5.  Baxter GM, Ingle JE, Trotter GW. Complete navicular bone frac-  31.  Dik KJ, van den Belt AJ, Enzerink E, et al. The radiographic devel-
                                                                  opment  of the distal  and proximal double  contours of  the
               tures in horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;41:243–244.  equine  navicular bone on dorsoproximal‐palmarodistal oblique
             6.  Bentley VA, Sample SJ, Livesey MA, et al. Morphologic changes   (upright pedal) radiographs, from age 1 to 11 months. Equine Vet
               associated with functional adaptation of the navicular bone of   J 2001;33:70–74.
               horses. J Anat 2007;211:662–672.                32.  Dorner C, Fueyo P, Olave R. Relationship between the distal pha-
             7.  Biggi M, Dyson SJ. High‐field magnetic resonance imaging inves-  lanx angle  and radiographic  changes in  the navicular  bone  of
               tigation of the distal border fragments of the navicular bone in   horses: a radiological study. Global J Med Res. 2017;17:7–13.
               horses with foot pain. Equine Vet J 2011;43:302–308.  33.  Drommer W, Damsch S, Winkelmeyer S, et al. Scanning electron
             8.  Biggi M, Dyson SJ. Distal border fragments and shape of the   microscopy of the sesamoid bone and deep flexor tendon of
               navicular bone: radiological evaluation in lame horses and horses   horses with navicular disease. Deutsche‐ Tiearztliche‐Wochenschrift
               free from lameness. Equine Vet J 2012;44:325–331.  1992;99:235.
             9.  Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, et al. Histopathology in horses with   34.  Dyson SJ. Comparison of responses to analgesia of the navicular
               chronic palmar foot pain and age‐matched controls. Part 1: navicu-  bursa and intra‐articular analgesia of the distal interphalangeal joint
               lar bone and related structures. Equine Vet J 2006;38:15–22.  in 102 horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;41:234–239.
            10.  Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, et al. Histopathology in horses   35.  Dyson SJ. Navicular disease. In Diagnosis and Management of
               with chronic palmar foot pain and age‐matched controls. Part   Lameness in the Horse. Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Elsevier
               2: the deep digital flexor tendon. Equine Vet J 2006;38:23–27.  Saunders, St. Louis, MO, 2011;324–342.
            11.  Blunden A, Murray R, Dyson S. Lesions of the deep digital flexor   36.  Dyson SJ. Primary lesions of the deep digital flexor tendon within
               tendon in the digit: a correlative MRI and post mortem study in   the hoof capsule. In Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in
               control and lame horses. Equine Vet J 2009;41:25–33.  the Horse. Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis,
            12.  Bos H, van der Meij GJ, Dik KJ. Heredity of navicular disease. Vet   MO, 2011;344–348.
               Q 1986;8:68–72.                                 37.  Dyson SJ. Radiological  interpretation of the  navicular bone.
            13.  Bowker  RM.  Contrasting  structural  morphologies  of  “good”  and   Equine Vet Educ 2011;23:73–87.
               “bad” footed horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2003;49:186–209.  38.  Dyson S, Murray R. Use of concurrent scintigraphic and magnetic
            14.  Bowker RM, Van Wulfen KK. Microanatomy of the intersection of   resonance imaging evaluation to improve understanding of the
               the distal sesamoidean impar ligament and the deep digital flexor   pathogenesis of injury of the podotrochlear apparatus. Equine Vet
               tendon: a preliminary report. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:623–627.  J 2007;39:365–369.
            15.  Bowker RM, Rockershouser SJ, Vex KB, et al. Immunocytochemical   39.  Dyson S, Murray R. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of
               and dye distribution studies of nerves potentially desensitized by   264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep
               injection onto the distal interphalangeal joint or the navicular   digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal inter-
               bursa of horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:1707–1714.  phalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 2007;39:340–343.
            16.  Bowker RM, Linder K,  Van  Wulfen KK. Distribution of local   40.  Dyson S, Murray R.  Verification of scintigraphic imaging
               anesthetics  injected into the distal  interphalangeal joint and   for injury diagnosis in 264 horses with foot pain. Equine Vet J
               podotrochlear bursa: an experimental study. Pferdeheilkunde   2007;39:350–355.
               1996;12:609–612.                                41.  Dyson SJ, Murray R. Lameness and diagnostic imaging of the
            17.  Bowker RM, Atkinson PJ, Atkinson TS, et al. Effect of contact   sports horse: recent advances related to the digit. Proc Am Assoc
               stress in bones of the distal interphalangeal joint on microscopic   Equine Pract 2007;53:262–274.
               changes in articular cartilage and ligaments. Am J Vet Res 2001;   42.  Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, et al. Lameness in 46 horses
               62:414–424.                                        associated with deep digital flexor tendinitis in the digit: diagnosis
            18.  Boyce M, Malone ED, Anderson LB, et al. Evaluation of diffusion   confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. Equine Vet J 2003;
               of triamcinolone acetonide from the distal interphalangeal   35:681–690.
               joint into the navicular bursa in horses. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:   43.  Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, et al. Magnetic resonance imag-
               169–175.                                           ing of the equine foot: 15 horses. Equine Vet J 2003; 35:18–26.
            19.  Busoni  V, Denoix JM. Ultrasonography of the podotrochlear   44.  Dyson SJ, Murray R, Schramme MC. Lameness associated with
               apparatus in the horse using a transcuneal approach: technique   foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses
               and reference images. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:534–540.  (January 2001–December 2003) and response to treatment.
            20.  Busoni V, Heimann M, Trenteseaux J, et al. Magnetic resonance   Equine Vet J 2005;37:113–121.
               imaging findings in the equine deep digital flexor tendon and dis-  45.  Dyson S, Blunden T, Murray R. The collateral ligaments of the
               tal sesamoid bone in advanced navicular disease—an  ex vivo   distal interphalangeal joint: Magnetic resonance imaging and post
               study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:279–286.      mortem observations in 25 lame and 12 control horses. Equine
            21.  Cillan‐Garcia E, Milner PI, Talbot A, et al. Deep digital flexor ten-  Vet J 2008;40:538–544.
               don injury within the hoof capsule; does lesion type and location   46.  Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme  M, et  al. Current concepts  of
               predict prognosis? Vet Rec 2013;173:70. doi: 1136/vr.101512.  navicular disease. Equine Vet Ed 2011;23:27–39.
            22.  MacGregor CM. Studies on the pathology and treatment of Equine   47.  Dyson SJ, Tranquille CA, Collins SN, et al. An investigation of the
               Navicular disease. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1984.  relationships between angles and shapes of the hoof capsule and
            23.  Colles  CM.  Navicular  disease  and  its  treatment.  Practice   the distal phalanx. Equine Vet J 2011;43:295–301.
               1982;4:29–36.                                   48.  Dyson SJ, Tranquille CA, Collins SN, et al. External characteris-
            24.  Crisman MV, Furr MO, Ley WB, et al. Evaluation of polysulfated   tics of the lateral aspect of the hoof differ between non‐lame and
               glycosaminoglycan for the treatment of navicular disease: a dou-  lame horses. Vet J 2011;190:364–371.
               ble blind study. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1993;39:219–220.  49.  Dyson SJ, Blunden T, Murray R. Comparison between magnetic
            25.  Dabareiner RM, Carter GK. Diagnosis, treatment, and farriery for   resonance imaging and histological findings in the navicular bone
               horses with chronic heel pain. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract   of horses with foot pain. Equine Vet J 2012;44:692–698.
               2003;19:417–441.                                50.  Eggleston RB. Equine imaging: the framework for applying
            26.  Dabareiner RM, White NA, Sullins KE. Comparison of current     therapeutic  farriery.  Vet  Clin North  Am  Equine  Pract  2012;
               techniques for palmar digital neurectomy in horses. Proc  Am   28:293–312.
               Assoc Equine Pract 1997;43:231–232.             51.  Eliashar E, McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. Relationship of foot con-
            27.  Dabareiner RM, Carter GK, Honnas CM. Injection of corticoster-  formation and force applied to the navicular bone of sound horses
               oids, hyaluronate, and amikacin into the navicular bursa in horses   at the trot. Equine Vet J 2004;36:431–435.
               with signs of navicular area pain unresponsive to other treatments:   52.  Erkert RS, MacAllister CG, Payton ME, et al. Use of force plate
               25 cases (1999–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1469–1474.  analysis to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous adminis-
            28.  Denoix JM. Functional anatomy of the equine interphalangeal   tration of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine in horses with
               joints. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1999;45:174–177.  navicular syndrome. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:284–288.
   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499