Page 540 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 540

506   Chapter 4


              The Sigafoos Series II shoe (Figure 4.80) is a kit that   discomfort of the animal, but also by the way the horse
            is composed of a cuff bonded to a rim that is attached to   lands. Adjusting the heel height so that the horse lands
  VetBooks.ir  foot (Sound Horse Technologies LLC, Unionville, PA).   fort and stability of the distal phalanx.
                                                               slightly heel first is likely to result in the greatest com-
            an aluminum plate that covers the ground surface of the
                                                                  The treatment time scale is highly variable and based
            The aluminum plates may be flat or wedged and have a
            urethane bonding surface to which additional wedges   on the severity of the original disease, recurrence of the
            may be bonded. This shoe can be highly customized to   disease, and the development of complications. However,
            achieve the principal objectives. The attachment of the   some generalizations can be made.  A more severely
            shoe with a cuff is atraumatic compared with nailing a   affected horse that is amenable to treatment and improves
            shoe on, and placement of the acrylic on the outside of   in an uncomplicated manner is usually shod somewhere
            the wall causes less harm to the wall than when the   between 3 and 6 weeks after the onset of the acute dis-
            acrylic is placed on the ground surface of the wall.   ease with eased break‐over, ground surface support, and
            Because  the  cuffed  shoes  follow  the  perimeter  of  the   heel elevation as needed. It is desirable to remove heel
            hoof capsule, they may require more extensive modifica-  elevation as soon as possible after the horse is comforta-
            tion to set the toe back compared with other methods of   ble landing with a flat foot to limit contraction of the
            shoe application.                                  heels, usually between 3 and 6 months. Sole support may
              The choice of shoe for each case is in large part per-  be removed, usually in a gradual manner, between 4 and
            sonal preference based on cost, experience, and avail-  8 months. The most successful cases may return to near
            ability. It is important to emphasize principles over   normal  shoeing  or  barefoot  trimming  between  8  and
            technique. There are several complications common to   12 months. Obviously, less severely affected horses that
            various shoeing techniques. Where weight‐bearing has   do not develop complications should recover corre-
            been relieved at the toe and concentrated at the quar-  spondingly quicker. Horses  that  suffer recurrent  acute
            ters, the wall at the quarters is likely to become thin-  episodes or develop complications may take much longer
            ner  and  less  resilient.  Additionally,  prolonged  heel   to respond or never respond satisfactorily.
            elevation frequently leads to heel contraction. Finally,
            prolonged attachment of the shoe with acrylics leads   Treatment of Chronic Laminitis with Distal Displacement
            to deterioration in the mechanical properties of the
            wall, particularly if it is applied to the ground surface   Horses that suffer distal displacement present differ-
            of the wall.                                       ent challenges from those with dorsal rotation. First,
              The  application  of  the  general  shoeing  principles   treatment directed at the acute and early chronic disease
            must be titrated to the specific symptoms of the indi-  frequently lasts considerably longer than that for horses
            vidual horse.  The less damaged the lamellae, the less   with rotation. Easement of break‐over and ground sur-
            aggressively eased break‐over, ground support, and heel   face support are both potentially beneficial and achieved
            elevation are required. Improving the ease of break‐over   in the same manner as previously described. However,
            benefits any horse with laminitis. The amount of area   there is no rationale or perceived benefit to elevating the
            across the ground surface of the foot that should be   heels; this commonly makes these horses worse.  The
            used to distribute weight‐bearing is subjective. Pressure   wooden shoe/clog has gained a great deal of popularity
            should be limited where compression of the underlying   in the treatment of distal displacement in the forelimbs.
            dermis may occur between the sole and an unstable or
            displaced distal phalanx. Otherwise, the comfort of the   Treatment of Chronic Laminitis with Unilateral Distal
            horse and the perceived instability of the distal phalanx
            are the best indicators. The requirement for (and degree   Displacement (Medial or Lateral Rotation)
            of) heel elevation is in part similarly determined by the   The transition between the hoof care used to treat
                                                               horses with acute and early chronic disease to that of
                                                               stable chronic laminitis due to unilateral displacement is
                                                               more blurred than in the  previous scenarios because
                                                               there is much less experience in treating this condition
                                                               and complications, particularly separation of the coro-
                                                               nary band, are common. However, in line with the over-
                                                               all objective to redirect the load away from the most
                                                               damaged area of the lamellae, the logical approach is to
                                                               attempt to redirect the load to the opposite side of the
                                                               foot in conjunction with ground surface support.  This
                                                                                                          55
                                                               can be accomplished by either placing a 4‐ to 8‐mm
                                                               extension (concentrating ground support on the
                                                               extended side; Figure 4.81) or placing a thin wedge on
                                                               the side of the foot opposite the displacement or chang-
                                                               ing the weight‐bearing area under the foot asymmetri-
                                                               cally. Of these treatments, the wedge is the most
                                                               aggressive and does not appear to be necessary and as
                                                               such is best avoided. Therefore, starting with an exten-
                                                               sion or modifying ground surface support is suggested.
                                                               The application of a wedge to the unaffected side of the
            Figure 4.80.  Sigafoos Series II shoe.             foot appears counterintuitive if only the radiographic
   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545