Page 653 - Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice
P. 653

640        SPECIAL THERAPY



               TABLE 26-3       Nutrient Composition               BOX 26-6       Recommended Rates
                                of Veterinary Liquid                              and Volumes for
                                Enteral Products                                  Enteral Feeding

                               CliniCare        CliniCare
                                Canine/           Feline           1. General Guidelines
            Product              Feline           Renal               A. Determine resting energy requirements (RER)
                                                                        caloric needs from Figure 26-1
                                                                      B. For formulas containing 1.5 kcal/mL, divide
            Manufacturer    Abbott Labs      Abbott Labs
                                                                        energy needs by 1.5 to get volume needed to feed
            Kcal/8 oz can (g)  237 (1)       237 (1)
                                                                      C. Increase feeding rate and volume only as patient
            mOsm/kg         340              290
                                                                        tolerance allows
            Kcal/mL         1                1
                                                                   2. Intermittent Bolus Feeding
            Protein (g)     8.2 g/100 kcal   6.3 g/100 kcal
            Protein source  Casein, whey     Casein, whey             A. Day 1: feedings delivered at 1=3to1=2   RER
                              protein          protein                  caloric goal q4-6h
            Fat (g)         5.1 g/100 kcal   6.7 g per 100 kcal       B. Day 2: feedings delivered at 2=3to 3=4   RER
            Fat source      Soybean oil,     Soybean oil,               caloric goal q4-6h
                              chicken fat      chicken fat            C. Day 3: feedings delivered at RER (100% of RER)
            Carbohydrate (g)  6.8 g/100 kcal  6.3 g/100 kcal            caloric goal q4-6h
            Carbohydrate    Corn maltodextrin  Corn maltodextrin      D. Feeding rate and volume can be increased as
              source                                                    patient tolerance allows
            Fiber           0.1 g/100 kcal   0.1 g/100 kcal        3. Continuous Feeding (hourly rate)
            Na % Dry Matter  0.35            0.27                     A. Day 1: delivery rate of enteral diet should be 1=3to
              þ
            Na (mg)         80 mg/100 kcal   62 mg/100 kcal             1=2   RER/24 hr
              þ
            K % dry matter  0.70             0.55                     B. Day 2: delivery rate of enteral diet should be 2=3to
             þ
                                                                        3=4   RER/24 hr
            K (mg)          160 mg/100 kcal  125 mg/100 kcal
             þ
            Ca 2þ  % dry matter  0.61        0.55                     C. Day 3: delivery rate of enteral diet should be 100
                                                                        RER/24 hr
            Ca 2þ  (mg)     140 mg/100 kcal  125 mg/100 kcal
                                                                      D. Feeding rate and volume can be increased as
            P i (mg)        120 mg/100 kcal  104 mg/100 kcal
                                                                        patient tolerance allows
            Mg 2þ  (mg)     10 mg/100 kcal   9 mg/100 kcal
            RATE AND VOLUME OF
            FEEDING                                              study evaluating continuous infusion and intermittent
                                                                 bolus feeding was performed in 10 healthy dogs with
            Approach the calculated goal for nutrients and fluids over  gastrostomy tubes. No difference was found in weight
            approximately 24 to 72 hours to prevent vomiting,    maintenance, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects,
            abdominal distention or signs of colic, and diarrhea  g-glutamyl transpeptidase, nitrogen balance, or feed
                                                                           20
            (Box 26-6). Slow rates of administration, particularly in  digestibility.  More recently, a retrospective study was
            animals that have been inappetent for prolonged periods,  performed at Michigan State University evaluating the
            prevent the problems of diarrhea and cramping, and max-  percentage of prescribed nutrition delivered (PPND) in
            imize the uptake of nutrients.                       37 dogs and 54 cats that were supported using
                                                                 nasoenteric feeding tubes. 16  The PPND was not signifi-
            ENTERAL NUTRITION                                    cantly different between patients fed continuously
            DELIVERY METHODS                                     (99.0%) and patients fed intermittently (92.9%). This
                                                                 study also found that the frequencies of GI complications
            The two most common EN delivery methods for veteri-  were not significantly different between the two delivery
            nary and human patients are continuous infusion or inter-  methods. Enterally fed dogs had a significantly higher fre-
            mittent bolus feedings. Critically ill patients with  quency of regurgitation and diarrhea than enterally fed
            impaired gastrointestinal mobility may better tolerate  cats. The retrospective nature of this study precluded
            continuous infusion of nutrition, whereas intermittent  the authors from making conclusions regarding the cause
            bolus feeding resembles a more physiologic method of  for discrepancy between prescribed and delivered
            providing calories. Randomized, controlled trials in  nutrition.
            human patients have failed to determine which delivery  Limitations associated with interpreting data from ret-
            method is superior in providing prescribed calories with  rospective research led Holahan and Abood to develop a
            minimal complications.* Few studies have examined
            EN delivery systems in critically ill small animals. A pilot  *References 23, 42, 45, 55, 65, 88.
   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658