Page 654 - Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice
P. 654

Enteral Nutrition    641


            prospective randomized clinical evaluation of continuous  Figure 26-17. Reservoirs and delivery tubes for feeding
            and intermittent feeding in critically ill dogs. 47  Fifty-four  solutions are available from a number of manufacturers.
            dogs admitted to the critical care unit and requiring  Reservoirs containing a 12- to 24-hour supply of diet
            nutritional support with a nasoenteric (NE) feeding tube  solution can be hung and allowed to drip in by gravity.
            were enrolled. Dogs were randomized to receive either  Intermittent bolus feeding requires more veterinary staff
            continuous infusion (Group C) or intermittent bolus  time due to the set-up and contact needed every 4 to 6
            (Group I) of liquid EN. The percentage of prescribed  hours for multiple feedings. Therefore we recommend
            nutrition delivered (PPND) was calculated every 24  continuous feeding (constant rate infusion) using a com-
            hours. The frequency of gastrointestinal (GI), mechani-  mercial available syringe pump. Holahan and Abood have
            cal, and technical complications was recorded and gastric  found the Kangaroo 924 Enteral Feeding Pump
            residual volumes (GRVs) were measured. The median   (Figure 26-18) or Medfusion 2010i syringe pump
            days of delivered nutrition support was 3 (range 1 to
            8 days). PPND was significantly lower in Group C
            (98.4%) than Group I (100%). Although there was a sta-  BOX 26-7      Intermittent Bolus
            tistically significant difference in the PPND between con-            Feeding Instructions
            tinuously and intermittently fed dogs, this difference was            (to be done at each
            unlikely to be of clinical significance. Likewise, there was          feeding)
            no statistically significant difference in GI or mechanical
            complications, whereas Group C had a significantly
            higher rate of technical complications (see later discus-  1. Auscultate abdomen for gut sounds. Aspirate gently
            sion). GRVs did not differ significantly between Group   on tube; measure and record any gastric residual fluids,
            C (3.1 mL/kg) and Group I (6.3 mL/kg) and were           then replace fluid through tube. If more than half the
            not correlated to the incidence of vomiting or regurgita-  volume previously fed is removed and the patient is
                                                                     showing signs of gastrointestinal intolerance
            tion. Critically ill dogs can be successfully supported with  (vomiting/regurgitation), do not feed animal at this
            either continuous rate infusion (CRI) or intermittent    time (wait until next scheduled feeding).
            bolus feeding of EN with few complications. Elevated   2. Inject 5-10 mL water through tube; if this produces
            GRVs may not warrant termination of enteral feeding.     coughing, the tube may be in the respiratory tract.
              This study was the first published prospective clinical  3. When satisfied the animal can be fed, resume feeding
            trial comparing delivery methods in dogs with NE-tubes;  schedule. If necessary, place animal in sternal or right
            it was also the first to evaluate gastric residual volumes  lateral recumbency. Solution should be warm to room
            (GRVs) in critically ill dogs. Subjects in both groups   temperature and should be fed slowly. Bolus feed over
            had GRVs measured and recorded every 4 hours. Median     30-60 minutes to assess the patient’s tolerance and
                                                                     monitor for vomiting or aspiration.
            GRVs for all dogs were 4.5 mL/kg and no significant dif-
                                                                   If The Animal Vomits, Stop Feeding
            ference was identified between the two delivery methods.
                                                                   4. After feeding, flush the tube with 5-10 mL warm water
            Additionally, no correlation was identified between the
                                                                     and replace cap or cover, leaving the tube full of water.
            incidences of vomiting or regurgitation and the amount
                                                                   5. Observe the animal for discomfort, colic, or diarrhea
            of GRVs. Results from this study have been used to estab-  for the next few minutes.
            lish guidelines and long-term goals in our Critical Care  6. Record each feeding and document any problems.
            Unit focusing on minimizing complications and reducing  7. Nothing is to be administered via the tube, except the
            technician time, while maximizing delivery of prescribed  feeding solution, without the permission of the
            calories.                                                clinician.
              Bolus and CRI feeding instructions are outlined in
            Box 26-7 and a rescue protocol is described in



                                                      If patient vomits or regurgitates > 2 times in 24 hours

                                                          12-hour cessation of EN ordered
                                          1 or more episodes of vomiting or regurgitation  No vomiting or regurgitation in 12-hour period
                                           Additional 12-hour cessation of EN ordered  Resume feeding at last recorded caloric volume/rate

                                  Continued vomiting or regurgitation  No vomiting or regurgitation
                                 Alternative method of nutrient delivery  Resume feeding at lowest rate (1/3 RER)
                        Figure 26-17 Suggested Rescue Protocol for canine patients admitted to the critical care unit receiving
                        enteral nutrition support through nasoenteric feeding tubes. 47
   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659