Page 1442 - Veterinary Immunology, 10th Edition
P. 1442

VetBooks.ir  Diagnostic Applications of




               Immunological Tests



               Obviously the presence of antibodies to a specific organism in an
               animal's serum indicates previous exposure to an epitope present
               on that organism. It does not, however, prove that infection exists
               or that any concurrent disease is actually caused by the organism in

               question. For example, the fact that the sera of most healthy horses
               contain antibodies to Salmonella typhimurium does not prove that
               most horses are suffering from salmonellosis. The presence of
               antibodies to an organism in a single serum sample is rarely of

               diagnostic significance. Only if at least two samples are taken 1 to 3
               weeks apart and show at least a four-fold rise in titer can a
               diagnosis be made. This should be done only in conjunction with
               careful clinical assessment.

                  A second feature that must be considered in the interpretation of
               serological tests is the possibility of errors. Technical errors are
               usually prevented by incorporation of appropriate controls into the
               test system. Other errors, however, are largely unavoidable. For

               example, if test results are obtained from a known diseased
               population and from a known disease-free population, it will be
               rare to find that the results obtained separate perfectly. Much more
               commonly, the test results overlap, and the test cannot distinguish

               normal from diseased with 100% accuracy (Fig. 42.32). As a result,
               irrespective of the selected cut-off point, there will be some correct
               results and some incorrect ones. There will be four types of result:
               true-positive and true-negative results and false-positive and false-

               negative results. A test in which a large proportion of the positive
               results are true is considered to be specific, whereas one that
               correctly identifies the true-negative responses is considered
               sensitive. A perfect test would be highly sensitive and highly

               specific. In ideal tests, it would be desirable for the criteria used in
               interpreting the test results to be so obvious and absolute that each
               test would be absolutely sensitive and specific. Unfortunately, such
               ideal tests are uncommon. In general, the level of test errors can be

               adjusted by the point used to differentiate positive from negative





                                                        1442
   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447