Page 221 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 221

Examination for Lameness  187


                                                                  8.  Bowker RM, Linder K, Van Wulfen KK, et al. Distribution of local
                                                                    anesthetics  injected into the distal  interphalangeal joint and
                                                                    podotrochlear bursa: an experimental study. Pferdeheilkunde
  VetBooks.ir                                                     9.  Carter GK, Hogan PM. Use of diagnostic nerve blocks in lameness
                                                                    1996;12:609–612.
                                                                    evaluation. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1996;42:26–32.
                                                                 10.  Castro FA, Schumacher JS, Pauwels F, et al. A new approach for
                                                                    perineural injection of the lateral palmar nerve in the horse. Vet
                                                                    Surg 2005;34:539–542.
                                                                 11.  Chesen  AB,  Dabareiner  RM,  Chaffin  MK,  et  al.  Tendonitis  of
                                                                    the  proximal aspect of the superficial digital flexor tendon in
                                                                    horses: 12 cases (2000–2006) J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009;234:
                                                                    1432–1436.
                                                                 12.  Claunch KM, Eggleston RB, Baxter GM. Effects of approach and
                                                                    injection volume on diffusion of mepivacaine hydrochloride dur­
                                                                    ing local analgesia of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve
                                                                    in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;245:1153–1159.
                                                                 13.  Contino EK, King MR, Valdes‐Martinez A, et al. In vivo diffusion
                                                                    characteristics following perineural injection of the deep branch
                                                                    of the lateral plantar nerve with mepivacaine or iohexol in horses.
                                                                    Equine vet J 2015;47:230–234.
                                                                 14.  Daniel AJ, Goodrich LR, Barrett MF, et al. An optimized injection
                                                                    technique for the navicular bursa that avoids the deep digital
                                                                    flexor tendon. Equine Vet J 2016;48:159–164.
             Figure 2.198.  Needle location and angulation of the spinal   15.  David F, Rougier M, Alexander K, et al. Ultrasound‐guided cox­
             needle used to inject the contralateral sacroiliac joint from the   ofemoral arthrocentesis in horses. Equine Vet J 2007;39:79–83.
             cranial aspect of the tuber sacrale. A 10‐inch (25‐cm), 15‐ to   16.  Denoix JM, Jacquet S. Ultrasound‐guided injections of the sacro­
             16‐gauge spinal needle is bent to an angle of about 40° in the   iliac area in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2008;April:203–207.
             direction of the needle’s bevel. The needle is inserted through a stab   17.  Dyson SJ. Comparison of responses to analgesia of the navicular
             incision in the skin 1 inch (2 cm) cranial to the contralateral tuber   bursa and intra‐articular analgesia of the distal interphalangeal joint
             sacrale and directed at a 60° angle to the vertical plane.  in 102 horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;41:234–239.
                                                                 18.  Dyson SJ. The puzzle of distal interphalangeal joint pain. Equine
                                                                    Vet Edu 1998;10:119–125.
             injection can be made by using one width of the hand to   19.  Dyson  SJ,  Murray  R.  Pain  associated  with  the  sacroiliac  joint
             represent the length of one cervical vertebra.  The facet   region: a clinical study of 74 horses. Equine  Vet J 2003;35:
                                                   48
                                                                    240–245.
             joint is imaged with the ultrasound probe, and a 3.5‐  20.  Dyson SJ, Romero JM. An investigation of injection techniques
             inch (8.9‐cm), 18‐ to 20‐gauge spinal needle is advanced   for local analgesia of the equine distal tarsus and proximal meta­
             toward the joint at an angle so the tip of the needle can   tarsus. Equine Vet J 1993;25:30–35.
             be seen. The cervical articular processes and joint form   21.  Easter JL, Watkins JP, Stephens SL, et al. Effects of regional anes­
                                                                    thesia on experimentally induced coffin joint synovitis. Proc Am
             an easily identifiable sonographic landmark, a steplike   Assoc Equine Pract 2000;46:214–216.
             echogenic surface described as having the appearance of   22.  Engeli E, Haussler KK, Erb HN. Development and validation of a
             a “chair.”  Ultrasound is used to direct the needle into   periarticular injection technique of the sacroiliac joint in horses.
                     44
                                                                    Equine Vet J 2004;36:324–330.
             the joint and the solution is deposited.            23.  Ford TS, Ross MW, Orsini PG. Communication and boundaries
                                                                    of the middle carpal and carpometacarpal joints in horses. Am J
                                                                    Vet Res 1988;49:2161–2164.
             ACKNOWLEDGMENT                                      24.  Ford  TS, Ross MW, Orsini PG.  A comparison of methods for
                                                                    proximal palmar metacarpal analgesia in horses.  Vet Surg
               The authors thank Dr. Ted S. Stashak for his contri­  1989;18:146–150.
             butions to this chapter in the previous edition.    25.  Gayle JM, Redding WR. Comparison of diagnostic anaesthetic
                                                                    techniques of the proximal metatarsus in the horse. Equine Vet
                                                                    Educ 2007;May:222–224.
             References                                          26.  Goodman NL, Baker BK. Lameness diagnosis and treatment in
                                                                    the Quarter Horse racehorse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract
              1.  Adams SB, Moore GE, Elrashidy M, et al. Effect of needle size and   1990;6:85–108.
                type, reuse of needles, insertion speed, and removal of hair on   27.  Gough MR, Munroe GA, Mayhew G. Diffusion of mepivacaine
                contamination of joints with tissue debris and hair after arthro­  between adjacent synovial structures in the horse. Part 2: tarsus
                centesis. Vet Surg 2010:39:667–673.                 and stifle. Equine Vet J 2002;34:85–90.
              2.  Baxter GM. Perineural and intrasynovial anesthesia. In Manual of   28.  Grant BD. Bursal injections. Proc  Am  Assoc Equine Pract
                Equine Lameness, 1st ed. Baxter GM ed. Wiley‐Blackwell, Ames,   1996;42:64–68.
                IA, 2011;114–146.                                29.  Hague BA, Honnas CM, Simpson RB, et al. Evaluation of skin
              3.  Baxter GM, Stashak TS. Perineural and intrasynovial anesthesia.   bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation of clipped and
                In Adams and Stashak’s Lameness in Horses, 6th ed. Baxter GM   nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses.  Vet Surg 1997;26:
                ed. Wiley‐Blackwell, Ames, IA, 2011;173–202.        121–125.
              4.  Bell BTL, Baker GJ, Foreman JH, et al. In vivo investigation of   30.  Harper J, Schumacher J, Degraves F, et al. Effects of analgesia of
                communication between the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal   the digital flexor tendon sheath on pain originating in the sole,
                joints in horses and ponies. Vet Surg 1993;22:289–292.  distal interphalangeal joint or navicular bursa of horses. Equine
              5.  Bidwell LA, Brown KE, Cordier A, et al. Mepivacaine local anaes­  Vet J 2007;39:535–539.
                thetic duration in equine palmar digital nerve blocks. Equine Vet J   31.  Hassel DM, Stover SM, Yarbrough TB, et al. Palmar‐plantar axial
                2004;36:723–726.                                    sesamoidean approach to the digital flexor sheath in horses. J Am
              6.  Bowker RM, Rockershouser SJ, Vex KB, et al. Immunohistochemical   Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:1343–1347.
                and dye distribution studies of nerves potentially desensitized by   32.  Hendrickson DA, Nixon AJ. A lateral approach for synovial fluid
                injections into the distal interphalangeal joint or the navicular   aspiration and joint injection of the femoropatellar joint of the
                bursa of horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:1708–1714.  horse. Equine Vet J 1992;24:397–398.
              7.  Bowker RM, Van Wulfen KK, Grentz DJ. Nonselectivity of local   33.  Hoerdemann M, Smith RL, Hosgood G. Duration of action of mepi­
                anesthetics injected into the distal interphalangeal joint and navic­  vacaine and lidocaine in equine palmar digital perineural blocks in
                ular bursa. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;41:240–242.  an experimental lameness model. Vet Surg 2017;46:986–993.
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226