Page 222 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 222

188   Chapter 2


            34.  Hogan PH, Honnas CM. Diagnostic neural and articular anesthe­  60.  Schramme MC, Boswell JC, Hamhougias K, et  al. An  in vitro
               sia. In Current Techniques in Equine Surgery and Lameness, White   study to compare 5 different techniques for injection of the navic­
                                                                  ular bursa in the horse. Equine Vet J 2000;32:263–267.
               NA, Moore JN, eds. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1998;490–500.
  VetBooks.ir  35.  Hughes TK, Eliashar E, Smith RK. In vitro evaluation of a sin­  61.  Schumacher J, Steiger R, de Graves F, et al. Effects of analgesia of
               gle injection technique for diagnostic analgesia of the proximal
                                                                  the distal interphalangeal joint or palmar digital nerves on lame­
                                                                  ness caused by solar pain in horses. Vet Surg 2000;29:54–58.
               suspensory ligament of the equine pelvic limb. Vet Surg 2007;
               36:760–764.
            36.  Ingle‐Fehr JE, Baxter GM. Endoscopy of the calcaneal bursa in   62.  Schumacher J, de Graves F, Steiger R, et al. A comparison of the
                                                                  effects of two volumes of local analgesic solution in the distal
               horses. Vet Surg 1998;27:561–567.                  interphalangeal joint of horses with lameness caused by solar toe
            37.  Jordana M, Martens A, Duchateau L, et al. Distal limb desensitiza­  or solar heel pain. Equine Vet J 2001;33:265–268.
               tion following analgesia of the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses   63.  Schumacher J, Schramme MC, Schumacher J, et al. A review of
               using four different techniques. Equine Vet J 2014;46:488–493.  recent studies concerning diagnostic analgesia of the equine fore­
            38.  Just EM, Patan B, Licka TF. Dorsolateral approach for arthrocentesis   foot. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2003;49:312–316.
               of the centrodistal joint in horses. Am J Vet Res 2007;68:946–952.  64.  Schumacher J, Gillette R, DeGraves F, et al. The effects of local anes­
            39.  Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kreeger JM, et al. Local distribution of   thetic solution in the navicular bursa of horses with lameness caused
               mepivacaine after distal interphalangeal joint injection in horses.   by distal interphalangeal joint pain. Equine Vet J 2003;35:502–505.
               Am J Vet Res 1996;57:422–426.                   65.  Schumacher J, Livesey L, DeGraves FJ, et al. Effect of anaesthesia
            40.  Keg PR, Barneveld A, Schamhardt HC, et al. Clinical and force   of the palmar digital nerves on proximal interphalangeal joint
               plate evaluation of the effect of a high plantar nerve block in   pain in the horse. Equine Vet J 2004;36:409–414.
               lameness  caused  by  induced  mid‐metatarsal  tendonitis.  Vet  Q   66.  Schumacher J, Schumacher J, Schramme MC. Diagnostic analge­
               1994;16(Suppl 2):S70–S75.                          sia of the equine forefoot. Equine Vet Educ 2004;June:199–204.
            41.  Kiely RG, McMullan W. Lateral arthrocentesis of the equine car­  67.  Schumacher J, Livesey L, Brawner W, et al. Comparison of 2 meth­
               pus. Equine Pract 1987;9:22–24.                    ods of centesis of the bursa of the biceps brachii tendon of horses.
            42.  Kraus‐Hansen AE, Jann HW, Kerr DV, et al. Arthrographic analy­  Equine Vet J 2007;39:356–359.
               sis of communication between the tarsometatarsal and distal   68.  Seabaugh KA, Selberg KT, Valdes‐Martinez A, et al. Assessment of
               intertarsal joints of the horse. Vet Surg 1992;21:139–144.  the tissue diffusion of anesthetic agent following administration
            43.  Lewis RD. Techniques for arthrocentesis of equine shoulder, elbow,   of  a  low  palmar  nerve  block  in  horses.  J  Am  Vet  Med  Assoc
               stifle and hip joints. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1996;42:55–63.  2011;239:1334–1340.
            44.  Mattoon JS, Drost WT, Grguric MR, et al. Technique for equine   69.  Seabaugh KA, Selberg KT, Mueller POE, et al. Clinical study eval­
               cervical articular process joint injection. Vet Radiol Ultrasound   uating the accuracy of injecting the distal tarsal joints in the horse.
               2004;45:238–240.                                   Equine Vet J 2017;49:668–672.
            45.  Miller SM, Stover SM. Palmaroproximal approach for arthrocen­  70.  Serena A, Schumacher J, Schramme MC, et al. Concentration of
               tesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint in the horse. Equine Vet   methylprednisolone in the centrodistal joint after administration
               J. 1996;28:376–380.                                of methylprednisolone acetate in the tarsometatarsal joint. Equine
            46.  Misheff MM, Stover SM. A comparison of two techniques for   Vet J 2005;37:172–174.
               arthrocentesis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Equine  Vet J,   71.  Shepherd MC, Pilsworth RC. Failure of intra‐articular anaesthe­
               1991;23:273–276.                                   sia of the antebrachiocarpal joint to abolish lameness associated
            47.  Moyer W, Carter GK. Techniques to facilitate intra–articular injec­  with chip fracture of the distal radius. Equine  Vet J 1993;25:
               tion of equine joints. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1996;42:48–54.  458–461.
            48.  Moyer W, Schumacher J, Schumacher J. A Guide to Equine Joint   72.  Southwood LL, Baxter GM, Fehr JE. How to perform arthrocen­
               Injection and Regional Anesthesia. Veterinary Learning Systems,   tesis  of  the  fetlock  joint  by  using a  distal  palmar  (plantar)
               Yardley, PA, 2007;6–65.                            approach. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1997;43: 151–153.
            49.  Nagy A, Bodo G, Dyson SJ. Diffusion of contrast medium after four   73.  Spoormakers TJ, Donker SH, Ensink JM. Diagnostic anaesthesia
               different techniques for analgesia of the proximal metacarpal region:   of the equine lower limb: a comparison of lidocaine and lidocaine
               an in vivo and in vitro study. Equine Vet J 2012;44:668–673.  with epinephrine. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 2004;129:548–551.
            50.  Nottrott K, De Guio C, Khairoun A, et al. An ultrasound‐guided,   74.  Stack JD. Bergamino C, Sanders R, et al. Comparison of two ultra­
               tendon sparing, lateral approach to injection of the navicular   sound‐guided injection techniques targeting the sacroiliac joint
               bursa. Equine Vet J 2017;49:655–661.               region in equine cadavers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016;
            51.  Piccot‐Crezollet C, Cauvin ER, Lepage OM. Comparison of two   29:386–393.
               techniques for injection of the podotrochlear bursa in horses.   75.  Stashak TS. Examination for lameness. In Adams’ Lameness in
               J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:1524–1527.             Horses, 5th ed. Stashak TS, ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,
            52.  Pleasant RS, Moll HD, Leg WB, et al. Intra‐articular anesthesia of   Philadelphia, 2002;113–183.
               the distal interphalangeal joint alleviates lameness associated with   76.  Steel CM, Pannirselvam RR, Anderson GA. Risk of septic arthritis
               the navicular bursa in horses. Vet Surg 1997;26:137–140.  after intra‐articular medication: a study of 16,624 injections in
            53.  Poore LA, Lambert KL, Shaw DJ, et  al. Comparison of three   Thoroughbred racehorses. Aust Vet J 2013;91:268–273.
               methods of injecting the proximal interphalangeal joint in horses.   77.  Swiderski CE, Linford R. How to inject the medial femorotibial
               Vet Rec 2011;168:302.                              joint: an alternate approach. Proc  Am  Assoc Equine Pract
            54.  Reeves M, Trotter GW, Kainer R. Anatomic and functional com­  2005;51:476–480.
               munications between the synovial sacs of the equine stifle joint.   78.  Toth F, Schumacher J, Schramme M, et al. Evaluation of four tech­
               Equine Vet J 1991;23:215–218.                      niques for injecting the trochanteric bursa of horses.  Vet Surg
            55.  Rocconi RA, Sampson SN. Comparison of basilar and axial sesa­  2011;40:489–493.
               moidean approaches for digital flexor tendon sheath synoviocentesis   79.  Trotter GW, McIlwraith CW. Clinical features and diagnosis of
               and injection in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;243:869–873.  equine joint disease. In Joint Disease in the Horse. McIlwraith
            56.  Sack WO. Nerve distribution in the metacarpus and front digit of   CW and  Trotter GW, eds.  WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1996;
               the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975;167:298–335.    125–134.
            57.  Sack WO, Orsini PG. Distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints   80.  Vacek JR, Ford TS, Honnas CM. Communication between the
               in the horse: communication and injection sites. J Am Vet Med   femoropatellar and medial and lateral femorotibial joints in
               Assoc 1981;179:355–359.                            horses. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:1431–1434.
            58.  Sams AE, Honnas CM, Sack WO, et al. Communication of the   81.  Vazquez de Mercado R, Stover SM,  Taylor KT, et  al. Lateral
               ulnaris lateralis bursa with the equine elbow joint and evaluation   approach for arthrocentesis of the distal interphalangeal joint in
               of caudal arthrocentesis. Equine Vet J. 1993;25:130–133.  horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212:1413–1418.
            59.  Schneeweiss W, Puggioni A, David F. Comparison of ultrasound‐  82.  Whitcomb MB, Vaughan B, Katzman S, et al. Ultrasound‐guided
               guided vs. ‘blind’ techniques for intra‐synovial injections of the   injections in horses with cranioventral distention of the coxofem­
               shoulder are in horses: scapulohumeral joint, bicipital and infraspi­  oral joint capsule: feasibility for a cranioventral approach.
               natus bursae. Equine Vet J 2012;44(674–678.        Vet Radiol Ultrsound 2016;57:199–206.
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227