Page 190 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 190

Avian Reovirus |   183

                  (A)




















                  (B)
















          Figure 6.3  Characteristic cytopathic effect (CPE) induced by avian orthoreovirus. (A) QM5 cell line uninfected control (left) and QM5 cell
          line 2 days post infection with American crow reovirus isolate (right). (B) Vero cell line uninfected control (left) and Vero cell line 6 days post
          infection with American crow reovirus isolate (right). Note the multinucleated giant cells (syncytia) and in B, right, detachment and floating
          debris in medium. The scale bar represents 100 µm. (Kalupahana 2017).


          in many cell cultures. In chicken embryo cell cultures, CPE was   growth rate, special growth requirements, inability to subculture
          first detected on the ninth, seventh and fourth passage of avian   (Barta et al., 1984), tedious and time-consuming preparation
          orthoreovirus strains Type 24, Type 25 and Type 59, respectively   (Nwajei et al., 1988) make them less desirable than continuous
          (Deshmukh and Pomeroy, 1969). The CPE of these viruses   cell lines.
          appeared at 5–7 days PI, and syncytia became numerous and
          larger upon further incubation, until the entire monolayer was
          destroyed by day 9 PI, however, the maximum virus titre was less   Continuous cell lines
               2
          than 10  plaque forming units per millilitre (PFU/ml). Strain R1   Several mammalian cell lines have been used to propagate avian
          of avian orthoreovirus, when prepared in CELu, CEK and CELi   reoviruses, including those of bovine origin Madin Darby bovine
          cell cultures produced titres of 6.2, 6.2 and 7.0 log10 TCID ,   kidney (MDBK), and Georgia bovine kidney (GBK), canine
                                                          50
          respectively, by the third passage, which increased to 8.2, 7.2 and   origin Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK), murine origin
          8.4 log10 TCID , respectively, by the 25th passage, while the   L929, human origin Chang C, Hep-2, HeLa, primate origin
                       50
          virus propagated in CEF only produced a maximum titre of 6.0   LLC-MK2, African green monkey kidney (VERO), feline origin
          log10 TCID /ml (Guneratne et al., 1982). In addition to the   Crandell feline kidney (CrFK), baby hamster kidney (BHK),
                   50
          higher titre of virus, CELi cultures also produced larger plaques   rabbit kidney (RK), and porcine kidney (PK) (Sahu and Olson,
          than CEK cultures. More blind passages (5–7) were required   1975; Barta et al., 1984). In addition, avian orthoreoviruses were
          before CPE was observed in virus isolation attempts using CL,   grown in avian origin continuous cell lines, such as three cell lines
          CK, and CTCC with avian orthoreovirus strains Type 24, Type   established from a chemically induced fibrosarcoma of Japanese
          25, Type 59, FC, WVU 1464–29H, WVU 2937, WVU 2986, and   quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) (Moscovici et al., 1977) QT35
          WVU 71–212 (Guneratne et al., 1982).                  (Cowen and Braune, 1988), QT6 (Duncan et al., 1996), QM5,
            Avian orthoreoviruses have a predilection for primary cultures   a clonal derivative of QT6 (Duncan and Sullivan, 1998), and
          of chicken cells (Guneratne et al., 1982). Therefore, primary   chicken  macrophage  derived  HD11  cell  line  (Swanson et al.,
          chicken or chicken embryo origin cells have been considered the   2001).
          most suitable cell culture for isolation and propagation of avian   Data in literature on adaptation of avian reovirus to heter-
          orthoreoviruses (Mustaffa-Babjee et al., 1973). However, slow   ologous cell systems are inconsistent (Georgieva and Jordanova,
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195