Page 195 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 195

188  |  Kibenge et al.

          turkey-origin avian reoviruses, the sequence differences on gene   reverse genetics system for mammalian orthoreovirus strains
          segments S3 (Kapczynski et al., 2002; Sellers et al., 2004), S1 (Day   type 1 Lang (T1L) and type 3 Dearing (T3D) has been devel-
          et al., 2007), and S4 (Patin-Jackwood et al., 2008) may simply   oped, based on bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase, which can be
          reflect reassortment of genome segments between isolates of the   supplied transiently by recombinant vaccinia virus (rDIs-T7pol)
          same species (but not those of different species). However, one   or by cells that constitutively express the enzyme (Kobayashi
          of the turkey-origin avian reoviruses (strain NC/SEP-R44/03)   et al., 2007; Boehme et al., 2011). The efficiency of virus rescue
          grouped closely with S1 sequences from Nelson Bay orthoreovirus   was enhanced in a second-generation system by combining the
          (NRV), which is a different Orthoreovirus species (isolated from   cDNAs for multiple reovirus gene segments onto single plasmids
          fruit bats in Australia (Gard and Compans, 1970) (Day et al.,   to reduce the number of plasmids from ten to four, using BHK
          2007).                                                cells that express T7 RNA polymerase increased the efficiency
            The genotypic differences in some cases have been sufficient   of viral rescue to reduce the incubation time required to recover
          to support establishment of separate new species within the   infectious virus and eliminate biosafety issues associated with use
          genus Orthoreovirus (Huhtamo et al., 2007; Dandár et al., 2014;   of recombinant vaccinia virus. Kawagishi et al. (2018) recently
          Ogasawara et al., 2015; Kalupahana, 2017). Phylogenetic rela-  reported the development of a  plasmid-based  reverse genetics
          tionships within the avian reoviruses based on the σNS (S4) gene   system free of helper viruses and independent of any selection for
          is illustrated in Fig. 6.4 (only isolates for which sequences of all   the fusogenic orthoreovirus NBV. Kawagishi et al. (2018) used
          three most variable genes: λB (L2), σC (S1), and σNS (S4) (Liu   the system to generate viruses deficient in the cell attachment pro-
          et al., 2003) were available in the GenBank database were used to   tein σC and were able to demonstrate that σC is dispensable for
          construct the phylogenetic trees).                    cell attachment in several cell lines, including murine fibroblast
            The σNS (S4) gene phylogenetic tree clearly shows two main   L929 cells but not in human lung epithelial A549 cells, and plays
          clusters consisting of the species Avian orthoreovirus (ARV) iso-  a critical role in viral pathogenesis. They also used the system to
          lated from domestic or wild poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks,   rescue  NBV  that  expresses  a  yellow  fluorescent  protein.  Most
          geese, pigeon, quail), and the species  Wild bird orthoreovirus   recently, Wu et al. (2018) used a novel duck reovirus strain TH11
          isolated from wild birds (Pycno-1 passeriformes and the corvid   in the ten plasmid-based reverse genetics system based on bacte-
          orthoreovirus Tvärminne avian virus) (Fig. 6.4). The isolates of   riophage T7 RNA polymerase in BSR-T7/5 cells and production
          the Wild bird orthoreovirus species are very similar to Nelson Bay   of infectious virus was shown by inoculation of cell lysate derived
          orthoreovirus species in the phylogenetic tree for segment L2   from transfected cells into 10-day duck embryos.
          (figure not shown). In fact, Tvärminne avian virus (Huhtamo et
          al., 2007; Dandár et al., 2014) and American crow orthoreovirus
          (Kalupahana, 2017) may represent a separate new species within   Pathogenesis
          the genus Orthoreovirus. In the σNS (S4) tree (Fig. 6.4), ARV   The host range of avian reoviruses includes all domestic and wild
          further splits into three genotype clusters: the chicken/turkey   poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, pigeon, quail) (Jones,
          isolates genotype I, the duck/goose isolates genotype II, and the   2013) and a wide range of free-ranging (wild) birds (Huhtamo
          chicken isolates from Hungary genotype III. The chicken/turkey   et al., 2007; Kalupahana, 2017). Avian orthoreovirus was first
          genotype  I  is  more  heterogeneous  with  chicken  isolates  from   isolated from chickens with chronic respiratory disease (Fahey
          China, USA, and Canada forming subgroup Ia and the turkey   and Crawley, 1954). This initial isolate was originally termed the
          isolates from USA and Hungary and other chicken isolates from   Fahey-Crawley agent, and was later characterized as an orthoreo-
          USA and Canada in subgroup Ib. The duck/goose genotype II   virus (Petek et al., 1967). Subsequently, avian orthoreoviruses
          has two main subgroups: subgroup IIa consisting of the classical   were isolated from a variety of clinical presentations in chickens,
          Muscovy reovirus (classical MDRV) strain ZJ2000M in which   including viral arthritis/infectious tenosynovitis (Glass et al.,
          σC is encoded by S4 and not by S1 and σNS is encoded by S3   1973; Jones et al., 1975), runting-stunting syndrome/malabsorp-
          and not by S4 (Kuntz-Simon et al., 2002; Yun et al., 2013), as   tion (van der Heide et al., 1981; Page et al., 1982; Robertson et al.,
          usually described for avian reoviruses, and subgroup IIb consist-  1984), cloacal pasting (Deshmukh and Pomeroy, 1969), hydrop-
          ing of other Muscovy, Mallard and Pekin duck and goose isolates   ericardium (Bains et al., 1974; Spradbrow and Bains, 1974; Jones,
          (Fig. 6.4).                                           1976), myocarditis and pericarditis (Mustaffa-Babjee et al., 1973),
                                                                and hepatitis (Mandelli et al., 1978). Orthoreoviruses have been
          Reverse genetics                                      conclusively demonstrated to cause viral arthritis/infectious ten-
          Roner et al. (1990) first reported that mammalian orthoreovi-  osynovitis in chickens (van der Heide, 1977). However, it is not
          rus RNA was infectious by transfecting a combination of viral   exclusively associated with viral arthritis and tenosynovitis (van
          ssRNA, viral dsRNA, and in vitro-translated viral ssRNA prod-  der Heide, 2000), but can be associated with a variety of diseases
          ucts with Lipofectamine into cells that were then infected by a   including gastroenteritis (Deshmukh and Pomeroy, 1969), myo-
          helper reovirus of a distinct serotype. This allowed the rescue   carditis and pericarditis (Mustaffa-Babjee et al., 1973), respiratory
          of temperature-sensitive reovirus mutants, opening the way to   disease (Fahey and Crawley, 1954), feathering abnormalities,
          Reoviridae reverse genetics (Roner et al., 1997). More recently, a   hepatitis (Mandelli et al., 1978), hydropericardium (Bains et
          new helper virus-independent reverse genetics system has been   al., 1974; Spradbrow and Bains, 1974; Jones, 1976), ruptured
          established for mammalian orthoreoviruses. A plasmid-based   gastrocnemius tendon (Jones  et  al., 1975), cloacal pasting in
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200