Page 198 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 198

Avian Reovirus |   191

          latent orthoreovirus infections which complicates the course of   possibly following initial avian orthoreovirus induced tendon
          the disease (Tang et al., 1987a). The virulence of orthoreovirus   damage. However, bacteria were not present in all clinical out-
          infections in chickens was synergistically enhanced by coinfec-  breaks of tenosynovitis (Kibenge et al., 1982a). Tenosynovitis
          tion with Eimeria spp. (Ruff and Rosenberger, 1985a) whereas   was experimentally reproduced in chickens by infecting them
          Staphylococcus aureus (MacKenzie and Bains, 1977; Kibenge et   with avian orthoreoviruses via intra-muscular, intra-peritoneal,
          al., 1982a), Mycoplasma synoviae (Bradbury and Garuti, 1978),   intra-abdominal, subcutaneous, respiratory, and footpad inocula-
          Cryptosporidium baileyi (Guy et al., 1988), and infectious bursal   tion routes as well as horizontally in non-infected birds in contact
          disease virus (IBDV) (Springer  et  al., 1983; Moradian  et  al.,   with infected conspecifics (Kerr and Olson, 1969; Johnson, 1972;
          1990) have been reported to exacerbate disease caused by avian   Olson and Khan, 1972; van der Heide et al., 1974, 1980; Sahu and
          reoviruses. Avian reovirus may also enhance disease conditions   Olson, 1975; Jones and Onunkwo, 1978). Tenosynovitis or viral
          caused by other pathogens including chicken anaemia virus   arthritis lesions have been identified in varying degrees of severity
          (CAV) (McNeilly et al., 1995), Escherichia coli (Rosenberger et   in affected birds, and the severity of lesions depends on the breed
          al., 1985), IBDV (Moradian et al., 1990), and common respira-  of chicken (Jones and Kibenge, 1984), the age at the time of
          tory viruses (Rinehart and Rosenberger, 1983). Moreover, it has   infection (Carboni et al., 1975; Wood and Thornton, 1981), route
          been demonstrated that co-infections of  avian reoviruses with   of inoculation (Wood and Thornton, 1981; Islam et al., 1988),
          other immunosuppressive pathogens of chickens, including avian   and presence of secondary bacterial infections (MacKenzie and
          reticuloendotheliosis virus, CAV, and avian leucosis virus, lead to   Bains, 1977; Kibenge et al., 1982a; Hill et al., 1989).
          diminished weight gain, poor feed conversion and reduced mar-  The clinical signs of infection following oral inoculation of
          ketability of affected birds (Xie et al., 2012).      one day old SPF light hybrid chickens included depression and
                                                                lameness (Kibenge and Wilcox, 1983), prostration (Jones and
                                                                Georgiou, 1984), and anorexia at day 2 PI (Tang et al., 1987b),
          Clinical features                                     but by day 8 PI the chicks in all these studies appeared normal.
          Known pathogenic avian orthoreoviruses, the diseases caused   The tenosynovitis lesion consisted of a unilateral swelling on the
          by them, and their isolation history is given in Table 6.2. Dinev   plantar aspect of the leg, below the hock joint by 3–4 weeks PI
          (2010) has excellent pictures of the different clinical conditions.  (Jones and Georgiou, 1984) which decreased by 8 weeks PI.
                                                                Mortality, poor growth, decreased feed conversion efficiency,
          Tenosynovitis/viral arthritis                         and carcass condemnation were associated with acutely infected
          Arthritis was first recognized as a major cause of leg weakness in   flocks (Schwartz et al., 1976). Viral mortality of chicks began day
          poultry by Olson (1959). Arthritis of chickens with a definite   4 PI (Tang et al., 1987b; Afaleq and Jones, 1991) and continued
          viral aetiology was first described in the USA by Olson and Kerr   until day 10 PI (Kibenge and Dhillon, 1987). The growth rates
          (1966) and the aetiology was identified as an orthoreovirus by   observed by measuring body weight were found to be significantly
          electron microscopy (Walker et al., 1972). A similar condition   lower in inoculated chickens than in the corresponding control
          was reported in the United Kingdom, which was called tenosyno-  group at 5 weeks PI (Kibenge and Dhillon, 1987). Affected
          vitis (Dalton and Henry, 1967). The term avian tenosynovitis was   birds usually had difficulty accessing feed and water and became
          originally used to describe an inflammation of the tendon sheaths   emaciated  (Kibenge  and  Wilcox,  1983).  However,  another
          and tendons caused by Mycoplasma synoviae (Dalton and Henry,   experiment using a different strain of avian orthoreovirus showed
          1967), whereas the orthoreovirus associated disease was referred   no significant differences between the weights of the infected and
          to as viral arthritis (Olson, 1973). Later, both terms were used   control groups within 2–6 weeks PI (Jones and Kibenge, 1984).
          to describe the orthoreovirus-associated disease (Kibenge and   Sometimes no clinical signs were observed until 3 or 5 weeks PI
          Wilcox, 1983), but the true arthritic lesions were present only in   (Kibenge et al., 1985; Kibenge and Dhillon, 1987). In field condi-
          the late stages of the disease (Kerr and Olson, 1969). Isolation   tions, orthoreovirus associated lameness is seldom encountered
          of an avian arthrotropic orthoreovirus from broiler chickens with   before 7 weeks of age (Jones and Onunkwo, 1978), even though
          ruptured gastrocnemius tendons was reported in Britain by Jones   the affected birds were infected at a very young age or through egg
          et al. (1975), and the disease was experimentally reproduced in   transmission (van Loon et al., 2001).
          light breed chickens by Jones and Onunkwo (1978). Although   The macroscopic lesions of orthoreovirus induced tenosynovi-
          many pathogens such as adenoviruses (MacKenzie and Bains,   tis are mainly confined to the hock joints and leg tendons (Rhyan
          1976),  Staphylococcus aureus (Johnson, 1972; MacKenzie and   and Spraker, 2010) and are characterized by swelling of the hock
          Bains, 1976; Macdonald et al., 1978), Mycoplasma synoviae (Kerr   joints and lesions in the gastrocnemius tendons (Benavente and
          and Olson, 1969), and  Mycoplasma iowae (Dobson and Glis-  Martínez-Costas, 2007). The most prominent findings in the
          son, 1992) were commonly isolated from tenosynovitis lesions   disease are swelling of the tibiotarsal-tarsometatarsal region and
          of affected chickens, avian orthoreoviruses were considered to   extensive swelling of the digital flexor and metatarsal extensor ten-
          be the primary aetiological agent that caused the tenosynovitis   dons. Jones and Georgiou (1984) noted tendon swelling below
          (van der Heide, 1977). MacKenzie and Bains (1976) suggested   the hock at 3 weeks PI and above the hock by 6 weeks PI. Inflam-
          Staphylococcus aureus was a secondary pathogen that exacerbated   mation of the swollen tendon areas often proceeds to a chronic
          the primary avian orthoreovirus lesion, and similarly other bac-  hardening and fusion of the tendon sheaths (Stott, 1999) at 9
          teria were more likely to be secondary opportunistic pathogens   weeks PI (Jones and Georgiou, 1984). As the tendons become
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203