Page 340 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 340

Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus |   331

          (Fahey et al., 1983; Fahey and York, 1990). Furthermore, no dif-  that different chicken breeds will have different susceptibilities to
          ferences were observed in levels of ILTV infection of the trachea,   ILTV infection (Loudovaris et al., 1991a,b; Poulsen et al., 1998),
          detected by  immunofluorescence, between vaccinated bursec-  and that a larger proportion of monocytes/macrophages isolated
          tomised and intact chickens, despite detectable differences in   from chickens that are resistant to ILTV get infected with ILTV,
          the levels of local IgA and IgY between both groups (Fahey and   and vice versa.
          York, 1990). Passive transfer of hyper-immune anti-ILTV serum   Studies that have examined host-gene transcription during in
          produced high levels of humoral antibody in the recipients but   vitro (Lee, J. et al., 2010, 2012) and in vivo ILTV infections (Luo et
          did not result in significant differences in terms of clinical disease   al., 2014; Vagnozzi et al., 2016; Coppo et al., 2018; Vagnozzi et al.,
          when recipient chickens were inoculated with virulent ILTV   2018) have revealed that a number of innate immune responses
          compared with those that received serum from uninfected SPF   are induced in primary sites of viral replication (in vitro), includ-
          chickens prior to ILTV inoculation (Fahey et al., 1983). Taken   ing induction of cellular defence mechanisms, cell cycle regulation
          together, the results from all these studies indicated that humoral   and matrix metalloproteinases (Lee et al., 2010; Coppo et al.,
          or mucosal antibodies were not important for protection against   2018). In vivo, the responses measured at late time points in the
          ILTV during first exposure or after vaccination and challenge.  acute phase of infection (6 days pi) were more associated with the
            Early studies using adoptive transfer of different types of   orchestration of adaptive immune responses, with induction of
          immune cells between histocompatible chickens, determined   pathways involved in antigen processing and presentation, posi-
          that splenocytes obtained from immunized chickens, but not   tive regulation of immune processes, activation of leucocytes and
          from naïve chickens, was capable of conferring protection against   lymphocytes, T-cell activation and T-cell receptor signalling (Luo
          virulent ILTV challenge. Similar results were obtained through   et al., 2014). These findings are consistent with the histopatho-
          the transfer of PBMCs from immunized chickens, but not cells   logical characteristics of ILTV infection of the upper respiratory
                                                                                                 +
          obtained from the bursa of Fabricius or the thymus (Fahey et al.,   tract, where infiltration with CD4 , CD8  and B cells has been
                                                                                           +
          1984). These results highlighted the importance of ILTV-specific   observed at 4 days pi (Devlin et al., 2010).
          cell-mediated immunity in the containment of ILTV infection,   Recent studies have revisited the local immune responses
          and, as the authors speculate, would suggest that non-specific   at the trachea after CEO vaccination and subsequent challenge
          immune cells present in the spleen of unsensitised chickens,   (Vagnozzi et al., 2016), and have shown that a rapid interferon
          such as NK cells or monocytes, would be less important. How-  gamma response (within 6 hours after challenge) occurs concom-
          ever, recent studies that have examined the anti-viral effects of   itantly with a decrease in viral gene transcription. The effector
          toll-like receptor agonists applied in vitro to primary monocytes   cells involved in this immune response have not yet been iden-
          or to monocyte/macrophage cell lines (MQ-NCSU or HD11),   tified, but a similar response was not observed in unvaccinated
          or  in ovo, have demonstrated that non-specific stimulation of   chickens, hinting that resident effector memory T-cells may be
          the immune system induces anti-viral mechanisms, mediated   involved in this response. More recent studies have determined
          by monocytes/macrophages, that can reduce ILTV infection of   cytokine transcription in a range of tissues of the upper respira-
          cells and chicken embryos before hatch, and chicks after hatch   tory tract following infection with ILTV and found that the peak
          (Haddadi et al., 2013, 2015; Thapa et al., 2015; Abdul-Cader et al.,   of pro- (chCXCLi2, IL-1β, IFN-γ) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10,
          2018; Ahmed-Hassan et al., 2018). The role of monocytes/mac-  IL-13) cytokine expression occurred concomitantly with peak
          rophages during in vivo ILTV infection has not been thoroughly   leucocyte infiltration and tissue damage of the mucosa (Vagnozzi
          investigated.                                         et al., 2018). These findings are consistent with those by Coppo et
            The study reported by Fahey et al. (1984) also indicated that   al. (2018) who determined that inflammation and peak cytokine
          ILTV infection of thymectomized chickens resulted in fulminant   transcription were the main drivers of tissue damage  in vivo
          clinical  disease  and  death,  however,  the  data  to  support  these   (Coppo et al., 2018). Interestingly, Vagnozzi et al. (2018) also
          observations was not presented. Further studies using bursec-  found that a rapid and transient up-regulation of IFN-y occurred
          tomised and thymectomized chickens by Honda  et al. (1994)   in the Harderian gland. This, combined with findings by Beltrán et
          reached similar conclusions to those of Fahey et al. (1983, 1984)   al (2017) who found that the Harderian gland may be a key player
          and Fahey and York (1990), in that bursectomised chickens   in the uptake of ILTV during acute infection, point towards this
          were capable of mounting protective immune responses against   gland having an important immunological role in the response
          ILTV  vaccine and/or subsequent  challenge, and that  thymec-  against ILTV.
          tomized chickens were less well protected after vaccination and
          subsequent challenge than untreated birds (Honda et al., 1994).
          Again, adoptive transfer of thymocytes or cells from the bursa of   Clinical features, diagnosis and
          Fabricius failed to protect chickens against ILTV but transfer of   epizootiology
          spleen or PBMCs from immunized birds did confer protection   This section presents an update on recent advancements in the
          against disease, and interestingly, one chicken (1/10) was also   area of ILTV and on some aspects of ILT where a gap exists in
          protected after transfer of splenocytes from unvaccinated chick-  the current literature. Basic concepts of ILT can be found in
          ens. Further support for the role of innate immune responses in   other references (Tripathy and García, 2008; García et al., 2013a;
          the containment of ILTV infections comes from the observations   Menendez et al., 2014; Nair et al., 2017).
   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345