Page 396 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 396

Avian Immune Responses to Virus Infection |   387

          sequences elicited protection from challenge (Hou et al., 2012;   class I molecules from the cell surface. There have been reports
          Tan et al., 2016). In another approach, overlapping peptides from   of  class  I  down-regulation  upon  reactivation  of  virus  in  MDV
          AIV identified a peptide that elicited cytokine secretion from   transformed cells (Hunt et al., 2001), with one study implicating
          and proliferation of both CD4 and CD8 cells from B19 chickens   the UL49.5 gene (Jarosinski et al., 2010) and another implicating
          (Haghighi et al., 2009). Finally, a powerful approach used often   the MDV012 gene (Hearn et al., 2015). In chickens, both TAP
          for mammals is the production of a soluble MHC molecule   and tapasin are polymorphic (Walker et al., 2011; van Hateren et
          bound to a particular peptide, the complex of which can be mul-  al, 2013), which in principle might be a counterstrategy to viral
          timerized to increase binding to specific T-cells (often referred   immune evasion proteins.
          to as MHC-peptide tetramers when streptavidin is used to mul-  A more subtle method of evasion is to stimulate inappropriate
          timerise) detected by flow cytometry (Xu and Screaton, 2002).   or regulatory (suppressive) CD4 T-cell responses. Such a misdi-
          Thus far, this approach has only been reported for an IBV peptide   rection of the immune response has been proposed for the MDV,
                       d
          (identified by I-E  class II molecule reactive mouse T-cells) with   which was reported not to stimulate a Th1 CD4 response appro-
          BF2*15:01 and NDV in chickens (Liu et al., 2013).     priate for inflammation and viral infection during the cytolytic
            By contrast, far less is understood about peptides and presen-  (acute) phase of MDV infection, but rather a Th2 CD4 response
          tation by chicken class II molecules to CD4 cells, an interaction   more appropriate for multicellular parasites and wound healing
          which is important for initiating most CD8 T-cell responses   (Heidari et al., 2008).
          as well as helping the B cell responses to produce appropriate
          antibodies. Self-peptides eluted from B19 and B21 cells have   Vaccines
          been reported for chicken class II molecules (Haeri et al., 2005;   Vaccination  is one of the great success stories of both human
          Cumberbatch et al., 2006). Functional assays for specific anti-  and farm animal medicine and is a consequence of the adaptive
          gen presentation by class II molecules on APCs to T-cells from   immune response. The initial (or primary) response to immuniza-
          chickens immunized with keyhole limpet hemocyanin have been   tion is relatively slow, but subsequent encounters are much faster
          reported (Vainio et al., 1988), but CD4 responses to viruses are   and more specialized. The slow primary response is due, at least
          limited to AIV-infected macrophage presentation (to both CD4   in part, to the enormous variety of clonal receptors, both TCRs
          and CD8 cells) as assessed by IFNγ secretion, for which the B2   and BCRs, so that there are relatively few naïve lymphocytes with
          haplotype was greater than B19 (Collisson et al., 2017).  any one receptor. Upon immunization with an antigen, these few
                                                                naïve lymphocytes proliferate over days resulting in many acti-
          Evasion of the adaptive immune response by            vated cells, which are selected for appropriate effector responses.
          viruses                                               Some of these activated cells become so-called memory cells,
          Viruses can evade the MHC-dependent immune response in   which are larger in number and more easily activated than the
          several ways. In the infection of an individual host, viruses with a   naïve cells were, and thus respond more quickly and aggressively
          reasonable mutation rate will result in a swarm (or quasi-species)   upon re-encounter with antigen.
          of closely related viruses. CTLs will not recognize and kill cells   Vaccination is widely used, along with biosecurity and genetic
          infected by viruses that have changed residue(s) necessary for pep-  resistance, for protection of poultry against viral pathogens.
          tide binding to the classical class I molecule(s) in that individual,   The practical aspects of poultry vaccination have been reviewed
          so that such mutated viruses will be selected. Promiscuous class   (Schijns et al., 2013). Attenuated live viral vaccines are commonly
          I molecules might be harder to evade in this way, since mutated   employed for poultry, due to the ease of attenuating viruses by
          peptides may still bind, perhaps explaining why the B2 and B21   repeated passage in eggs or in cultured cells which have no strong
          haplotypes confer resistance to many different viruses (Kaufman,   selection for the virus to maintain immune evasion mechanisms,
          2018). However, fastidious molecules may also confer resistance   and to the relatively low cost of producing and spreading live
          to certain viruses; for example, HLA-B*057:01, B*027:05 and   viruses. Such viral vaccines are weakened compared with the
          B*058:01 each bind a particular peptide that the human immuno-  original virulent virus, and so can elicit an immune response
          deficiency virus (HIV) can change to evade the immune response   without overt disease. They also can elicit both cellular (T-cell)
          but only with enormous loss of fitness (Schneidewind et al., 2007;   and humoral (B cell and antibody) responses through a Th1
          Miura et al., 2009). Similarly, antibody responses may be evaded   response. Attenuated live vaccines are relatively easy to deliver in
          by mutating peptides that would bind to the class II molecules.   water or spray and are widely used in the field to protect against
          Thus far, there have been no tests of these possibilities for chicken   many pathogenic poultry viruses, including AIV, IBDV, IBV, ILT,
          MHC molecules.                                        MDV and NDV.
            Viruses also evade the response more generally by interfer-  Viral-vectored vaccines use a live attenuated virus to express an
          ing with antigen processing and peptide loading. Many viruses   antigen from another virus (that is, a so-called subunit vaccine),
          that infect mammalian cells use a wide variety of mechanisms   and therefore come with many of the same advantages. Fowlpox
          to  down-regulate  peptide  presentation  by  class  I  molecules  to   virus (FPV) has been used for a variety of experimental vaccines
          T-cells (Früh et al., 1999; Griffin et al., 2010; Verweij et al., 2015).   as well as some commercial vaccines, particularly against AIV and
          For instance, herpesviruses express proteins that block TAP   NDV. More recently, herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT) that could
          translocation of peptides, degrade class I molecules, retain class   protect against early strains of MDV has been adapted to express
          I molecules in the Golgi apparatus, and enhance endocytosis of   antigens from other viruses and used in the field for IBDV. In
   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401