Page 397 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 397

388  |  Vervelde and Kaufman

          addition, expression plasmids have been used for so-called DNA   immune response (and likely the innate response through NK
          vaccines, which remain experimental due to issues with cost of   cells) to viral infection, there have been many efforts to under-
          production and necessity to inject the DNA.           stand the physical configuration of this genetic region in other
            A third general approach has been inactivated (killed or   birds. Among the gallinaceous birds, the turkey, grouse and pheas-
          fixed) viral vaccines, which do not infect cells but are taken   ant MHC are extremely similar in all aspects to chickens, while
          up by APCs for presentation and generally elicit only humoral   the prairie chicken has but one classical class I gene (Wang et al.,
          responses. Since the adaptive immune system will not even   2012; Eimes et al., 2013). Quails have a similar layout, but with
          begin to respond without stimulation and direction of the innate   several rounds of gene duplication. It was originally suggested
          immune system through the PRRs, PAMPs or danger-associated   that the many class I and class II B genes were an evolutionary
          molecular patterns (DAMPs, such as oil–water emulsions) that   response to greater pathogen challenges for migrating quails (and
          act as vaccine adjuvants are generally included. Such inactivated   this may still be true with specialized MHC molecules), but it has
          vaccines do not pass across epithelial barriers, so typically they   since been reported that there are single dominantly expressed
          are injected, which is cumbersome and costly. However, they are   class I and class II genes, just as in chickens (Shiina et al., 2004,
          good for boosting antibody responses after an initial vaccination   2006).
          with live viral vaccines, and therefore are used often for longer-  In ducks, there are five class I genes in a row, with a single
          lived egg-laying chickens.                            dominantly  expressed  class  I  gene  (UAA)  right  next  to  the
            An important delivery system that involves injection is in ovo   polymorphic TAP genes (Mesa et al., 2004; Moon et al., 2005).
          vaccination, in which eggs a few days before hatching are inocu-  The expression of another classical class I gene (UAC) is under
          lated. The development of a commercially available machine   microRNA control and increases during infection (Chan et al.,
          capable of injecting tens of thousands of eggs an hour has reduced   2016). Moreover, there are indications that the dedicated chap-
          costs to the point that in ovo vaccination is widely used for broiler   erone tapasin is missing in ducks (Magor et al., 2013). Several
          chickens in some countries (for instance, North America). How-  birds including falcons are reported to have a single dominantly
          ever, the immune system of late stage eggs seems to respond   expressed class I molecule (Alcaide et al., 2013), while the class
          far better to live attenuated and viral vectored vaccines than to   II regions of parrots are similar to the chicken, except that a class
          inactivated vaccines. There also can be difficulties with maternally   II A gene is next to the class II B genes (Hughes et al., 2008), as
          transmitted antibody, in which antibodies from a vaccinated hen   in mammals. A rather different organization has been suggested
          are passed to the egg and can therefore block vaccine responses   for ibis and oriental stork, but the assemblies are based on short
          in chicks.                                            sequencing reads and are incomplete, so the interpretations
            While vaccines are a mainstay in protection from viral disease,   remain speculative (Chang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Tsuji
          they can also select for viruses that escape immunity, if they   et al., 2017).
          protect only against disease and not against transmission of the   About half of all bird species are passerines (perching and
          pathogen between hosts. For instance, vaccination leads to the   song birds), and here the situation is even less clear. Early work
          selection of antigenic variants for AIV and IBDV, more virulent   highlighted the number of class I sequences expressed by great
          viruses for IBDV and MDV, and changes in cell tropism for MDV   reed warblers and willow warblers (Westerdahl et al., 2000).
          (Nagarajan and Kibenge, 1997; Barrow et al., 2003; Davison and   More recently, the same lab reports that three species of sparrows
          Nair, 2005; Ingrao et al., 2013). The changes found in MDV viru-  all have a number of classical (and non-classical) class I genes
          lence has been used as the basis for generalizing the arguments for   expressed, but only one at a high level (Drews et al., 2017). The
          human medicine and public health (Read et al., 2015).  zebra finch, studied extensively as a model organism for neuro-
                                                                biology and behaviour, is reported to have many class II B genes
          Birds other than chickens                             located on various chromosomes, but only one classical class
          Most of what is known about immunity to viruses outside of   I gene located on a different chromosome from the TAP genes
          mammals has been learned from chickens, but many birds suffer   and class II B gene (Balakrishnan et al., 2010). However, genetic
          important viral diseases. Other production and farm birds (tur-  analysis shows that the classical class I gene is next to the class II B
          keys, ducks and geese), sport birds (pigeons, falcons, quail and   genes (Ekblom et al., 2011), so more careful research is required.
          grouse), companion birds (parakeets/budgerigars) and wild birds   Multiple class I and/or class II B genes have been reported for
          (including a wide range of waterbirds and passerines) are known   other passerine species (O’Connor et al., 2016), but in general
          to (or must) suffer a variety of viral infections, and yet there is only   there is little or no information on expression, so there is yet
          limited knowledge of their immune responses (Adams et al., 2009;   much to be done.
          Wei et al., 2013; Q. Xu et al., 2016 ). Recent important challenges   In terms of genetic control of responses to viral infections,
          (among many others) include avian influenza virus, West Nile   there are many observations that the MHC as defined by par-
          virus and the psittacine beak and feather disease virus, and focus   ticular genes correlates with responses to particular pathogens,
          interest in further research, in part because of zoonotic potential   typically avian malaria. Thus far, there are no reports linking pas-
          (Reed et al., 2003; Pello and Olsen, 2013; Pérez-Ramírez et al.,   serine MHC responses to viral infection. There is also no work
          2014; Staley and Bonneaud 2015; Fogle et al., 2016; Mostafa et   on the adaptive immune responses, such as antibodies and T-cell
          al., 2018).                                           responses, to viral infection in passerines. Clearly, there is exciting
            Given the central role of the chicken MHC in the adaptive   research to be done.
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402