Page 432 - Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 5th Edition
P. 432

446        Small Animal Clinical Nutrition



                                                                      has resolved, i.e., “They’ll eat when they feel better.” However,
                    Table 25-3. Examples of hospital feeding orders.  it is better to be proactive and recognize the value of adminis-
        VetBooks.ir  1. Offer 2 cans of product XX every 6 hr PO.     tering nutrients to veterinary patients and realize that, “They’ll
                    2. Give 100 ml of product YY gruel every 6 hr via PEG (percuta-
                      neous gastrostomy) tube.                        feel better sooner when they eat.”
                    3. Administer 300 ml of parenteral solution IV every 8 hr.  Diseased and debilitated patients (hospitalized or not) need
                      Sometimes the feeding orders should contain special   to be assessed frequently, regardless of their age or lifestage.
                      conditions:                                     Assessment uses a number of parameters taken together to give
                    4. Begin feeding liquid product ZZ at 10 ml/hr via NG (nasogas-
                      tric) tube. D/C (discontinue) all feeding if vomiting begins.  an overall impression of whether a patient is experiencing mal-
                    5. Administer 300 ml of parenteral solution IV every 8 hr. Check  nutrition and requires specific nutritional intervention. Useful
                      urine glucose and decrease rate to 150 ml every 8 hr if urine  parameters to be assessed have been identified in large popula-
                      is positive. Recheck serum potassium daily and increase to
                      40 mEq/l if below normal.                       tions of people; however, no such parameters have been specif-
                    6. Give 30 ml of product YY gruel every 6 hr by PEG. Increase  ically formulated for dogs and cats. A veterinary nutritional
                      meal volume fed by 10 ml every 24 hr. decrease volume by  assessment protocol should include history, physical examina-
                      50% if vomiting begins.
                                                                      tion (with special attention given to certain risk factors), body
                                                                      condition assessment (BCS) and laboratory tests (Buffington,
                                                                      1994). Weight and dietary history, physical examination and
                                                                      body condition are relatively easy parameters to obtain. How-
                    Table 25-4. Laboratory data of a dog after four months
                    of starvation.                                    ever, specific laboratory and immunologic tests that correlate
                                                                      well with nutritional status have not been identified. To date,
                    Tests                  Results  Reference ranges  very few clinical studies have been performed in veterinary
                    Complete blood cell count*
                    RBC (x 10 /mm ) 3       2.73       4.62-8.3       patient populations to determine which parameters are applica-
                           6
                    HGB (g/dl)               6.5      11.6-20.6       ble and their accuracy in determining nutritional status and
                    HCT (%)                 18.2      33.1-66.4       predicting outcome (Michel, 1993).
                    Reticulocyte (%)         0.0        0-3
                           3
                    WBC (x 10 /mm ) 3        3.4       4.8-16.2
                    Fibrinogen (mg/dl)      430        88-380         History and Physical Examination
                    Serum biochemistry profile**                      All patients should receive a physical examination including an
                    Glucose (mg/dl)         172        65-110
                    AST (U/l)                79         9-43          accurate determination of body weight and an estimate of body
                    ALT (U/l)                75         14-50         condition. Weight changes must be viewed as a proportion or
                    Alkaline phosphatase (U/l)  230     5-125         percentage of “normal, usual or optimal” weight within a certain
                    Total protein (g/dl)     4.0       4.6-7.0
                    Albumin (g/dl)           2.1       2.6-4.2        time period as opposed to absolute changes in units (e.g., g or
                    Calcium (mg/dl)          8.5       8.9-11.1       kg lost). Weight loss of more than 10% within a week is clini-
                    Phosphorus (mg/dl)       2.9       3.0-5.9        cally significant and warrants further assessment. As a point of
                    BUN (mg/dl)              28        7.0-25.0
                    Creatinine (mg/dl)       0.2       0.6-1.6        reference, a weight change of 10 to 15% within several days is
                    Urinalysis                                        most likely a hydration problem and should be corrected first
                    Specific gravity        1.052    1.015-1.045      with medical or fluid management. Pets on a designated
                    pH                       7.0       6.0-7.5
                    Ketones                 Trace        -            weight-loss program can safely lose 1 to 4%, more typically 1 to
                    Key: HGB = hemoglobin, HCT = hematocrit, AST = aspartate  2%, of their body weight per week (Laflamme, 1993) (Chapter
                    aminotransferase, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, BUN =  27). A 10% (5 kg) weight loss within a week for a 50-kg dog is
                    blood urea nitrogen.
                    *MCV, MCH, MCHC, platelet numbers, WBC differential, blood  easily recognized as significant,but a similar percent weight loss
                    lead and coagulation profile were normal.         over seven days for a 5-kg cat (i.e., 0.5 kg) is not easily recog-
                    **Serum K, Mg, Na, Cl and total bilirubin concentrations were  nized. This weight loss should be considered as serious as the
                    normal.
                                                                      same percentage weight loss in the dog. It is more difficult to
                                                                      accurately determine a 0.5-kg weight change than a 5-kg
                                                                      change; therefore, cats should be weighed on a scale that is
                  of the patient to optimize the nutrition support plan.  accurate between 0 and 15 kg.
                                                                        Body weight is an objective measurement, whereas body con-
                                                                      dition is a more subjective evaluation of the patient’s tissue com-
                   PATIENT ASSESSMENT                                 position relative to its weight (i.e.,fat,muscle and bone) (Chapter
                                                                      1). Body condition scoring adds valuable information to body
                  Malnutrition can be recognized in patients through use of a  weight data. Decreasing fat stores indicate low energy intake and
                  nutritional assessment protocol. Nutritional assessment helps  vice versa. Muscle wasting implies protein intake has been insuf-
                  identify those patients that require assisted feeding to avoid or  ficient because skeletal muscle mass supports hepatic protein
                  reduce nutrient deficiencies and the associated complications.  synthesis when dietary intake is inadequate. In one human study,
                  Although inadequate nutrient intake may complicate many  using three independent clinicians’ nutritional assessment of the
                  disorders, anorexia has been traditionally viewed as a secondary  same 64 patients, there was a 77% agreement among clinicians,
                  problem that will improve when the primary disease problem  and their clinical judgment of nutritional risk correlated well with
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437