Page 42 - Mark Gommers "Bowlines Analysis
P. 42

The Bowline on a bight and the Karash double eye knot

                  A quick glance may fool the casual reader into thinking there are 2 nipping loops.
                  However, the Bowline on a Bight (#1080) only has 1 nipping loop. When Mike Karash
                  discovered his ‘Karash double loop’ – he didn’t realize that it was in fact a Bowline
                  derivative. There is no nipping ‘loop’ – rather it is a nipping ‘structure’ because it does not
                  take the form of a loop (it has the form of a ‘Munter hitch’).



                    Bowline on a Bight
                 “ABoK # 1080”

                                                  Collar


                    
















                  Karash double loop

                  ABoK # N/A                       Collar
                                                                           Capstan effect


                                                                                    Commentary:
                                                                                     The ‘Karash double loop’ (named after
                                                                                     discoverer Mike Karash) clearly has a
                                                                                     collar component. It also has a fixed
                                                                                     (double) eye. It remains easy to untie after
                                                                                     heavy loading. However, as per the single
                                                                                     eye version of this knot – is there a freely

               Nipping loop                                                          functioning nipping loop?
                                                                                     The nipping structure does not take the
                                                                                     form of a loop – it is in fact a crossing
                                                                                     hitch (Munter hitch). Due to the capstan
                                                                                     effect, the compressive force is not as
                                                                                     effective as it is in a helix.






                      Page 41 of 59      Bowline Analysis Version 2.7a    16 July 2016   © Copyright Mark Gommers
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47