Page 202 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 202

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
                               Char Count= 0
                         2:58
          August 31, 2006
 JWBK119-12
                               Logistic Regression Approach                  187
      Table 12.9 Logistic regression table for model with single categorical explanatory variable.
                                                               95% CI of odds ratio
                                                          Odds
      Predictors           Coefficient SE Coeff.  Z  p-value ratio Lower  Upper
      Constant             ˆ α S = 1.87  0.76  2.46  0.014

               Dummy
      Spine    variable
      Condition combinations

               c S1  c S2
      2         1    0     ˆ β S1 =−2.28  1.19  −1.92  0.055  0.10  0.01  1.05
      3         0    1     ˆ β S2 =−1.74  0.84  −2.06  0.039  0.18  0.03  0.92

      1, 2 and 3 can thus be evaluated by considering the three combinations of (c S1 , c S2 )at
      (0,0), (1,0) and (0,1) respectively. The linear functions for the log odds evaluated for
      each spine condition are listed in Table 12.10.
        The odds ratios evaluated at each setting of the categorical variable for spine con-
      ditions 2 and 3 shown in Table 12.9 are odds ratios in comparison with the case of the
      horseshoe crab having spine condition 1. The odds ratio is evaluated by taking the
      antilog of the logit functions shown in Table 12.10. The odds ratios corresponding to
      spine condition 2 and 3 are respectively

                                   ˆ
             ˆ
        exp α S + ˆ β S1 − ˆα and exp α S + ˆ β S2 − ˆα S .
      These odds ratios compare the relative differences in odds of finding satellite crabs
      for female horseshoe crabs with different spine conditions against a reference spine
      condition, which is spine condition 1 in this case. The confidence intervals for these
      odds ratio can be approximated using the asymptotic standard error of the parameter
      estimates. Using MINITAB, these confidence intervals are evaluated as (0.01, 1.05)
      and (0.03, 0.92) for the odds ratio spine conditions 2 and 3 respectively. From these
      confidenceintervals,thereappearstobenosignificantdifferenceintheoddsoffinding
      satellite crabs for female horseshoe crabs having spine conditions 1 and 2. However,
      the estimated odds of finding satellite crabs for female horseshoe crabs with spine
      condition 3 appears to be at most 0.92 times different from that of horseshoe crabs
      with spine condition 1.

            Table 12.10 Logit funtions relevant to each spine condition.

                                   Dummy variable
                                    combinations

                                                               π Pres  (c S1 ,c S2 )
            Spine Condition     c S1             c S2     log
                                                               1−π  (c S1 ,c S2 )
                                                                 Pres
            1                    0                0               ˆ α S
            2                    1                0            ˆ α S + ˆ β S1
            3                    0                1            ˆ α S + ˆ β S2
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207