Page 57 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 57

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
                               Char Count= 0
 JWBK119-04
        42 August 31, 2006  2:54  The Essence of Design for Six Sigma
        measure, analyze, design, and verify). In this chapter we present a general outline
        of the IDOV framework proposed by GE and implemented in Seagate Technology
        since the turn of the millennium. Since its adoption in late 1990s, successes have
        been reported by these corporations. Notably, GE Medical has secured leadership
        in terms of market share worth some US$2 billion globally for its CT scanners; and
        Seagate Technologies was presented a global Six Sigma Excellence Award in 2004 for
        “Best DFSS Project of the Year”. It is thus beneficial for other Six Sigma believers to
        understand the DFSS design/development process and learn the major tools in DFSS
        deployment.



                               4.2 THE IDOV ROADMAP

        The primary objective of DFSS is to design a product that pleases customers and
        achieves the maximum possible profitability within the safety constraints. To do so,
        it is imperative to manage risk during the product development process by assess-
        ing and controlling it by exercising trade-offs. This can only be achieved through a
        structured framework that emphasizes systems thinking and a toolset that allows the
        impact of decisions taken upstream on downstream operations to be quantified. These
        prerequisites motivate the IDOV roadmap for DFSS. The key phases are described in
        the rest of this section.


        4.2.1 Identify
        This is a highly strategic phase as one needs to identify the intended market segment
        for the product under design. On a macro scale, a cross-functional team must have
        a good idea of the emerging technologies, the market trend and the areas of growth.
        At the same time, the team must have their feet on the ground to understand their
        customers’ needs. With the aid of quality function deployment (QFD), the team will
        then translate critical-to-quality (CTQ) requirements into objective measures which,
        in turn, give the design targets and specifications. Using the target values, a gap
        analysis looking into various technological and functional aspects such as product
        performance, the stakeholders and the competitive advantage, complemented by a
        design failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), can be carried out. The final deliv-
        erable is a strategic plan that consists of three major elements: a project charter, the
        level 1 House of Quality, and matrices from gap analysis.
          The project charter is a first document that sets the stage for the project. It should
        be clear and concise in order to get the project off the ground, and will be revised
        along the way. It will be used to facilitate communication and obtain approval and
        buying-in from the sponsor and stakeholders. The elements of a project charter are
        listed in Table 4.1.
          QFDbasicallyinvolvesseveralstepswhichaimtotranslatethevoiceofthecustomer
        into relevant targets and specifications for the technical attributes of a product, its key
        components, the manufacturing processes, and the related operations through a series
                                                                  2
        of flow-down matrices commonly known as the House of Quality. An example of a
        level 1 House of Quality is presented in Table 4.2.
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62