Page 24 - Complexity Perspective_Neat
P. 24

which it interacts or synergy is lost and discord emerges.   Where task
                  level alignment fails, the system will lose processing efficiency and
                  effectiveness and will create more waste or even bring about the
                  failure of the system as a whole as it becomes uncompetitive.
                  Dissipative: Systems theory jargon in the hard sciences, terms all
                  systems including all business systems as 'dissipative'.  The
                  implication being that they are in a continuing state of decay under
                  entropic pressure. But, and it is a big BUT, organizations exist,
                  entrepreneurs found systems that grow and thereby create order and
                  structure. How does this happen?

                  Systems come into being by bundling endogenous energy (initial
                  funding, a founding team) to extract a constant inflow of exogenous
                  energy (resources, e.g., sales, investments) from the context. That
                  energy input allows the creation of order.
                  That said, as soon as the exogenous energy input declines, for
                  whatever reason, the system will start to collapse returning resources
                  to the context (investments withdrawn, key people leave). No system is
                  permanent though some can be very long-lived in a state of stable
                  energy input; a  terrible warning against strategic complacency and an
                  inward focus that diminishes information flow from the context.

                  Where did the idea of 'dissipation' come from, that it was so accepted
                  as to be the primary descriptor of all systems?

                             Ilya     Prigogine,      a    central      figure     in    the
                             development          of    complexity        theory,       was
                             intrigued...as  to  why  physics  seemed  to  suggest
                             that  situations  either  continue  without  change
                             (Newton’s  laws)  or  decline  into  featureless  dust
                             (thermodynamics).


                             His answer, in a nutshell, was that the physics of
                             the time (partly due to the pragmatic reason that
                             you otherwise could not tackle the maths) tended
                             to  assume  that  situations  of  interest  could  be
                             considered  as  closed,  and  therefore  independent
                             of, not interacting with, their environment. If we
                             recognize that situations of interest are generally
                             connected and engaged with their environment—




                                                                                                      24
                  ©Business Games Works 2018 (V1 Beta)
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29