Page 42 - AA 2018_09
P. 42
on the forehead of the RAAF Hornet,
Super Hornet and Growler aircrews’
Gentex HGU-55B helmet. JHMCS
(pronounced ‘ja-him-cus’) entered
service with the RAAF in 2007, and
projects flight and sensor data onto
the inside of the helmet’s visor, which
adds additional weight on the front of
the helmet.
At 1G the additional forward weight
of JHMCS can cause fatigue, when
manoeuvring at 7G plus for prolonged
periods it places considerable
additional strain on a pilot’s neck and
upper back, particularly in lateral
flight regimes. And the additional
weight of night vision goggles (NVG)
exacerbates the problem further.
However, aircrew neck problems
were prevalent well before the current
generation of helmets entered service.
“It’s been a problem as long as
we’ve had high-G aircraft, and it’s
just been one of those problems that’s
been accepted culturally as a part of
flying fast jets,” said James Wallace,
a human performance specialist and
head physiotherapist for Fighter Fit
with the RAAF’s Institute of Aviation
Medicine (IAM). While the JHMCS added to number of sorties a pilot could fly in a
“A pilot sits in a cockpit sustaining the RAAF’s Gentex HGU-55B professional sport as an example, there week, more needed to be done.
5 or 6G for a lot of the time when helmets has provided excellent is risk of injury and you expect there “In my view, the problem with
they’re doing BFM. This peaks out at situational awareness, it has are times in the season when you’re those strategies in the past was that
7.5G in the Hornet. That means your also come with a displaced going to be down. Culturally aircrew they relied a lot on the individual,”
head and helmet is going to weigh centre of gravity on the accept neck and back pain. Aircrew WGCDR Almenara said.
maybe 70 or 80 kilos while you’re helmet which is necessary tend to live with it.” “It was a case of, ‘here are some
moving and twisting it around, and to counteract with ballast But rather than just accepting tools to use and now go and manage
trying to keep your eyes on all the the problems, Air Combat Group yourself and advise us if you have
other aircraft. It’s very demanding. weights. defence decided to start recording injuries further problems’. But culturally,
“And it’s not just the neck, because and to investigate the cultural aspects aircrew just do not come forward
you’re also using your torso as well of aircrew not reporting problems. when there’s a problem. We just push
while you’re strapped into the ejection This saw ACG in conjunction with through it and keep going.”
seat,” Wallace continued. the Institute of Aviation Medicine GPCAPT Hake observed that the
“Physios will tell you the body is not conduct a series of aircrew surveys problem was more than about just
designed to hold that much weight on in 2016, which led to the startling economics.
your head. It has been a problem and discovery that the RAAF was losing “We don’t have to hurt people, and
air forces around the world have been the equivalent of seven man-years there is a moral dimension to this that
investigating what to do about it.” of productivity each year across its we’re very aware of,” he said. “It’s more
Even without performing BFM, fast-jet force, primarily due to neck than the pure economics, however
problems. That’s a significant number
long-endurance missions can cause for a small air force. economics is a good driver to get
problems. “On top of that, the majority of us investment. So, ACG has finally seen
“The Operation Okra missions occasionally have some problems that, this as an investment in our people,
were long, often 10-plus hour missions while we might still be flying, we’re not a cost, and that’s a big move
with NVGs, and that illuminated performing at sub-optimal levels,” said forward.”
the incidence of fatigue for longer WGCDR Almenara. ACG established a muscular-
missions as well,” officer commanding “Then there is a small percentage skeletal injury steering group.
78WG Group Captain Chris Hake said of people who get injured to the point “We looked at the whole range
of the recent RAAF Hornet and Super that they may never be able to fly a fast of mitigation options,” WGCDR
Hornet operational missions over Iraq jet again due to neck problems. ACG Almenara said. “Initially, we started
and Syria. and Air Force decided this was an looking at engineering solutions
Even for aircrew who don’t unacceptable level of attrition.” such as what can we do to modify
experience ongoing neck and back While ACG was aware of the the cockpit, the helmets, life support
issues, all require some rehabilitation problem and had introduced equipment and lumbar supports for
and a few weeks out of the cockpit mitigation strategies based on different postures.
every year. education, self-management and “Some of those were extremely
“It’s like any physical profession,” guidance which included limiting the expensive options, including trying
said WGCDR Almenara. “Using
42 AUSTRALIAN AVIATION