Page 42 - DIGITAL e-Book RCPH 2026
P. 42

Organised by:
   1   REGIONAL CONFERENCE  onon                                           O r g a n i s e d   b y :
                              N
                 L
                            E
               A

                                 E
                               C
                      N
                    O
                   C

                           R
                         E
                        F


      R
   1
        E

            O
             N

           I
         G
     st st
        R
                 C
             E
                                                     A
                                                 E
                                           H
                                                                  H
                                                              T
                                                          L
                             I
                        S
                      I

                                    N
                               O
   PRECISION HEALTH
   P P  R    E   C    I S    I O    N       H    E   A    L   T   H

                        Abstracts for 1st Regional Conference on Precision Health (RCPH)
                                  15-16th April 2026, Royale Chulan Kuala Lumpur
             Precision Oncology at Scale: What Works, What Breaks & What We Fixed
                                                     Dr. Tang Shir Ley
                                               Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                                                      ABSTRACT
      Precision oncology has changed how we think about cancer treatment, moving care from a one-size-fits-all
      approach towards therapies guided by molecular and genomic information. Technologies such as next-
      generation sequencing, biomarker testing, and molecular tumour boards have made it possible to match
      patients to more targeted and potentially more effective treatments. In many high-income settings, these
      approaches  are  now  part  of  routine  care.  In  middle-income  health  systems  like  Malaysia,  however,
      translating precision oncology into everyday clinical practice remains challenging. In Malaysia, elements of
      precision  oncology  are  already  in  place.  Molecular  testing  is  available  in  selected  public  and  private
      centres, and clinicians are increasingly using genomic information to guide treatment decisions in cancers
      such as lung, breast, and colorectal cancer. Multidisciplinary discussions around complex cases are also
      becoming more common. Despite this progress, these activities often function as individual projects, pilot
      programmes,  or  institution-specific  services,  rather  than  as  part  of  a  coordinated  national  healthcare
      system. As a result, access to precision oncology remains uneven, turnaround times are variable, data are
      fragmented, and treatment availability is inconsistent across different hospitals and regions. This keynote
      draws on practical experience from public oncology services and national service planning to reflect on
      what has worked, what has not, and what we have learned from attempting to scale precision oncology
      within  a  real-world  health  system.  Several  enabling  factors  have  proven  useful  in  practice,  including
      focusing  testing  on  clear  clinical  indications,  introducing  reflex  molecular  testing  through  pathology
      workflows,  centralising  more  complex  testing  to  specialised  laboratories,  sharing  costs  through  public–
      private  partnerships,  and  using  multidisciplinary  molecular  tumour  boards  to  support  clinical  decision-
      making. These approaches have shown that precision oncology can be delivered within existing resource
      constraints when it is closely aligned with clinical needs. At the same time, recurring challenges continue to
      limit impact. Molecular tests are sometimes performed without guaranteed access to the corresponding
      treatments.  Research-driven  testing  may  not  translate  into  service  delivery.  Funding  models  remain
      uncertain,  data  systems  are  poorly  integrated,  turnaround  times  can  be  too  slow  to  influence  clinical
      decisions, and there is a shortage of dedicated personnel to coordinate molecular workflows. Perhaps
      most importantly, there is a real risk that precision oncology may widen existing inequalities, benefiting
      patients in urban or well-resourced centres while leaving others behind. The presentation also outlines an
      ideal service model for the future, based on viewing precision oncology as a healthcare system rather than
      a collection of technologies. This includes clear clinical entry criteria for testing, a tiered national testing
      pathway,  coordinated  molecular  tumour  boards,  integrated  outcome  data,  and  a  defined  workforce  for
      molecular oncology. These elements are presented not as an existing national reality, but as a practical
      direction of travel. By distinguishing between what is currently happening and what still needs to be built,
      this session aims to offer a realistic and honest perspective on scaling precision oncology. Ultimately, the
      success of precision oncology will depend less on how advanced our technologies are, and more on how
      well we design systems that are accessible, equitable, and sustainable for the populations we serve.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47