Page 173 - BLACK SKIN, WHITE MASK
P. 173

134 BLACK SKIN, WHITE MASKS



                                and naturally he is always the winner. These stories belong to the
                                oral tradition of the plantation Negroes. Therefore it is relatively
                                easy to recognize the Negro in his remarkably ironic and wary
                                disguise as a rabbit. In order to protect themselves against their
                                own unconscious masochism, which impels them to rapturous
                                admiration of the (black) rabbit’s prowess, the whites have tried
                                to drain these stories of their aggressive potential. This is how
                                they have been able to tell themselves that “the black man makes
                                all the animals behave like a lower order of human intelligence,
                                the kind that the Negro himself can understand. The black man
                                naturally feels that he is in closer touch with the ‘lower animals’
                                than with the white man, who is so far superior to him in every
                                respect.” Others have advanced the theory, with straight faces,
                                that these stories are not reactions to the conditions imposed on
                                the Negro in the United States but are simply survivals of Africa.
                                Wolfe gives us the clue to such interpretations:

                                  On the basis of all the evidence, Br’er Rabbit is an animal because the
                                  Negro must be an animal; the rabbit is an outlander because the Negro
                                  must be branded as an outlander down to his chromosomes. Ever since
                                  slavery began, his Christian and democratic guilt as a slave-owner has led
                                  the southerner to describe the Negro as an animal, an unchangeable African
                                  whose nature was determined as protoplasm by his “African” genes. If
                                  the black man found himself relegated to the Limbo of mankind, he was
                                  the victim not of Americans but of the organic inferiority of his jungle
                                  ancestors.

                                  So the southerner refused to see in these stories the aggression
                                that the Negro infused into them. But, Wolfe says, their compiler,
                                Harris, was a psychopath:

                                  He was especially adept at this task because he was fi lled to the bursting
                                  point with pathological racial obsessions over and above those that
                                  tormented the South and, to a lesser degree, all of white America. . . . Indeed,
                                  for Harris as well as for many other white Americans, the Negro seemed
                                  to be in every respect the opposite of his own anxious self: unworried,
                                  gregarious, voluble, muscularly relaxed, never a victim of boredom, or








                                                                                         4/7/08   14:16:52
                        Fanon 01 text   134                                              4/7/08   14:16:52
                        Fanon 01 text   134
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178