Page 18 - The Gospel Chronicle - Redaction SE
P. 18

Redaction:  Introduction

       on which gospel  is granted priority. But from a chronological perspective less that 12% of the
       combined  content  can  be  removed.  These  two  results  cannot  be  reconciled;  they  are  too
       different. But how can there be such a large difference, when both perspectives have the same

       goal of comparing the gospels to each other?
             Before  investigating further  let’s first level the field  and  remove the  gospel  of John so
       that both perspectives contain only three of the four gospels. Adjusting the numbers to exclude
       the book of John, approximately 18,600 words should be subtracted from the total starting word

       count. The new word count for total gospel words is approximately 64,000 words, reducing by
       22.5%  of  its  total.  As  John  is  considered  to  have  too  little  shared  content  to  include  in  the
       Synoptic Gospel theory, then we shall subtract the same word count from the Gospel Chronicle
       Narrative, reducing it to 54,600 words or about 25.5%. The 3% difference should approximately
       represent  how  much  John  might  contribute  to  the  Synoptic  theory  should  John  have  been

       icluded. Now as before let’s subtract the narrative word count from the total gospel word count.
       The  result  is now  10,000  words  for  a  difference of  only  600  words between  the  John  inclusive
       and  John  exclusive  word  count.  This  increases  shared  content  amongst  the  three  remaining
       gospels to  17.5%,  a  5.5%  increase.  An  expected  result  if  the  gospel  of John contributes  more

       shared content than previously understood. All considered these compared percentages remain
       drastically  lower than  the  40-75%  shared  content suggested by  the  Synoptic  perspective.  The
       difference  is  clear.  But  why  is  there  such  a  large  difference  in  these  numbers?  Could  it  be
       because the gospels contain a much broader array of differing content than has been previously
       suggested?

             The  difference  lays  in  the  definition  of  shared  or  synoptic  content.  Observing  the
       Synoptic Gospel theory in practice, shared content is determined primarily by whether an event
       in  one  gospel  sounds similar  to  an  event  in  another gospel.  This  seems  practical,  but  quickly
       becomes very subjective, leading to a multitude of gospel harmonies which largely disagree on

       the  specific  arrangement  of  the  four  gospels’  events.  One  example  that  stands  out  is  the
       passages in Matthew and Luke that Jesus teaches the Beatitudes.



       ii • The Gospel Chronicle
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23