Page 42 - The Insurance Times November 2024
P. 42

FEATURE





          Legal liability for fraud in digital payments







         I     n the first four months of 2024, Rs. 1,750 crore has  winded, and there is no assurance that victims will receive

                                                              their lost funds. A fair and clear legal liability framework for
               been lost to cyber criminals. Victims are being
               targeted using online investment and trading scams,
                                                              fraudulent transactions could ensure protection and
               fake digital arrests, and OTP forwards, amongst
         others. During its annual conference in January, the Indian  adequate compensation to victims, while investigative
                                                              action continues in tandem. For such a framework, certain
         Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C, Ministry of Home  questions must  be  debated:  Who  is  responsible  for
         Affairs) reported that while some proportion of the amount  permitting the scam attempt? Did the victim take adequate
         that has been defrauded by scamsters since April 2021 was  steps to prevent themselves from falling prey? What are the
         "blocked due to prompt government initiatives", only 9-10  limitations to the compensation being offered? We discuss
         per cent of the same has been returned to the victims.  these below.
         With many Indians being first-time digital payment users,  Key Issues
         susceptibility to scams combined with the unpredictability  Discerning  eligible  and  authentic  complaints  for
         in the recovery of defrauded funds, can lead to a loss of trust
                                                              compensation: It is important to identify whether users may
         in digital interfaces. This situation is counterproductive to
                                                              have directly or indirectly authorised a transaction, whether
         the  policymakers'  goal  of  encouraging  more  digital  the entity to whom the money was transferred was the
         transactions, especially through payment systems like the
                                                              intended entity, and whether scamsters exploited previously
         Unified Payment Interface (UPI).
                                                              unknown system-level vulnerability or not to perpetrate the
         Legal liability and compensatory frameworks exist in India  fraud.
         for unauthorised electronic transactions. However, the
                                                              Laying out standardised criteria to determine eligible
         modus operandi in many common scams involves users being
                                                              complaints can streamline the process flow while also
         manipulated into authorising transactions. Technically, these
                                                              helping reduce the chance of nefarious actors from gaming
         transactions are authorised by users themselves, even
                                                              the system's response mechanisms. Centralised fraud
         though they did not intend to transact with a scamster. This
                                                              analytics and intelligence systems that are linked in real-
         renders such transactions to fall outside the perimeter of
                                                              time to existing fraud databases can play a critical role in
         any existing legal liability or compensation frameworks. In
                                                              establishing the authenticity of incoming complaints given
         July 2023, a Standing Committee on Finance's report on the
                                                              its capabilities in triangulating information.
         Rising Incidence of Cyber/White Collar Crimes mentioned an
         "automatic  compensation"  that  may  be  used  to   Establishing that the user was not negligent: A minimum
         "immediately compensate the hapless customer, pending  standard of caution may be considered when assessing users'
         further investigation and final traceability of funds".  negligence as part of a fraud attempt. This means that a
                                                              complaint can become eligible for automatic compensation
         This  recommendation  is  a  good  starting  point  for
                                                              only after  being  subjected  to certain checks  against
         conceptualising a framework for the apportionment of
                                                              negligence on the complainant's part. These standards may
         liability for different ecosystem entities that can limit user  include checking whether the users had acted as per
         losses and improve investments in prevention and detection
                                                              warnings and cautions issued by their banks, UPI apps or
         systems by banks, TPAPs (third party application providers),
                                                              the NPCI and RBI, whether they promptly reported any
         and other participants.
                                                              fraudulent incidents to banks or relevant stakeholders, and
         Investigations for fraudulent transactions can be long-  if they were responding appropriately and reasonably to
                                                                           The Insurance Times  November 2024  37
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47