Page 27 - Insurance Times May 2024
P. 27

The aircraft manufacturer's supply chain woes did not
         commence with the 737 Max. In his 2020 article for
         SupplyChainDigital.com, The Boeing 787 Dreamliner: A tale
         of terrible supply change management, Freddie Pierce
         wrote: "Boeing's production of the 787 Dreamliner is almost
         laughable. It has become such a mess, such a supply chain
         disaster, that it almost makes you think Boeing execs made
         Dreamliner decisions in some sort of strange alternative
         universe, like the Twilight Zone or something."

         Critical components get sourced from South Korea, Italy,
         Japan, Australia, China, Sweden, France and Canada. All
         have  significant  roles  in  the  production  of  the  787
         Dreamliner. The cogs turning to receive supplies from such  of aircraft manufacturing, to focus on design and final
         a vast network of global vendors have taken their toll on  assembly.
         Boeing, explained Pierce.
                                                              The reason manufacturers outsource certain component
         Brooke Sutherland is Bloomberg News' Boston bureau chief.  work is because doing so makes the overall process more
         She has written several eye-opening features on what's been  efficient and allows the companies up and down their supply
         recently going on at Boeing. Before a plugged door blew  chains to focus on their respective strengths. Boeing is never
         open on a 737 Max 9 Alaska Airlines flight in January, Boeing  going to be the ideal manufacturer of nuts and bolts.
         had disclosed two separate quality-control issues tied to
         Spirit AeroSystems: one involving incorrectly installed rear  Spirit had "always been a cost centre that was forced to
         fittings and the other being improperly drilled fastener  become a profit centre", says Sutherland. In its quest to
         holes.                                               bolster earnings and reduce the company's dependence on
                                                              Boeing, Spirit signed contracts with Airbus SE and the
         As the maker of the Max's fuselage, Spirit would have been  defense  industry  on  lopsided  terms  that  ended  up
         responsible for constructing the exit doors, both the useable  compounding forward losses on the Boeing 737 and 787
         ones and the plugged ones, although Boeing is meant to do  programmes. Both Boeing and Airbus have a keen interest
         quality-control checks on pressurisation and seals on the  in keeping Spirit alive because neither can produce airplanes
         finished planes at its own factories, and the FAA was meant  without the structural components made by the supplier.
         to be double-checking each 737 on its way out the door.
                                                              But the plane makers have historically not shown much
         That the incident will trigger sweeping changes as to how  interest in allowing Spirit to make the kind of profits that
         Boeing will work with its suppliers to build aircraft is the  would allow it to be a successful and truly independent
                                                              business. Spirit has relied on advances from Boeing and
         prevailing wishful thinking. Among the astute observers is
                                                              Airbus and a rejiggering of terms on the 737 and 787
         NYU Stern business ethics Professor Alison Taylor. "Boeing
         is paralysed, and this failing by its executives and directors  contracts to stave off a potential cashflow crunch. This isn't
         is to blame. The problem isn't a lack of controls, visibility or  a healthy supply chain, reminds Sutherland.
         knowledge. It's the lack of innovative thinking," she asserts
         in a recent op-ed for MarketWatch .                  Rather than regretting the hive-off or even wishing to
                                                              reacquire Spirit, Boeing should be looking at the following
                                                              risk triggers.
         Lest we miss the signal, let's shortly return to 'its corporate
         culture may be a big reason'.
                                                              Corporate culture

         Spirit was a part of Boeing until 2005, writes Brooke  Corporate scandals have a tendency to refocus us all on
         Sutherland, when the company sold the underlying assets  questions of corporate culture and governance, and Boeing
         of its aerospace structures business to private equity firm  is no exception. David Calhoun is the latest of a spate of CEOs
         Onex Corp. The idea at Boeing was to boost profit margins  to step down in disgrace, his fall cushioned by the usual
         by outsourcing the more capital-intensive fabrication work  golden parachute.

                                                                           The Insurance Times  May 2024      25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32