Page 28 - Insurance Times May 2024
P. 28

While some have been keen to frame Boeing's problems  Efforts to solicit dissenting views from more junior employees
          around its equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) efforts, this  should be deemed a priority. So far, this is still missing at
          argument is wildly unconvincing, reminds Taylor. What  Boeing. Until the company appreciates that safety is non-
          Boeing's  problems  actually  illustrate  is that  despite  negotiable for all stakeholders, from investors to customers,
          corporations adding more women and minorities to boards  Boeing will have to keep digging. A new CEO will not help.
          and C-suites during the past several years, conformity of  What is needed at Boeing is an entirely new mindset on core
          thought and the strength of social ties are more powerful.  corporate governance topics.

          Groupthink                                          Squeezing the supplier

          Taylor quotes Nell Minow, a leading corporate governance  If you develop a plan to squeeze your suppliers, you cannot
          specialist, about boardroom groupthink: "We take these people  just call it the 'squeeze the suppliers' programme. You need
          of extraordinary ability and achievement. We put them in a  a nice name. Boeing calls it 'Partnering for Success', explains
          boardroom  and  there  they  suddenly  become  totally  Guido Palazzo, ethics professor  at  the  University of
          incompetent. Why is that? My answer is that these are people  Lausanne. What it means in reality is that suppliers have to
          who have a genius for sizing up the norms of the room and  reduce their costs by 15% while producing more. The
          adapting to them. And that is a fabulous quality to have. But  problem is that Orwellian newspeak does not keep doors
          unfortunately, you've got 11 people like that - and one very  falling off planes in the skies, he warns.
          visionary, dynamic leader who controls their information, their
          access to other people in the organisation, and even their Profit over safety
          tenure and their compensation. That's not a good system."  Boeing's acquisition of a struggling McDonnell Douglas in
                                                              1996 is identified by many old-timers "as the moment when
          Board selection criteria vary, but while efforts have been  Boeing went from being led by engineers to being led by
          made to increase the independence of board members,  business executives driven by stock performance".
          personal and social connections still predominate. Many
          studies demonstrate that members tend to have similar  Boeing, the pride of American manufacturing, prioritised
          backgrounds, political affiliations and even religious beliefs.  financial gain over safety, with the federal government as a
                                                              collaborator, says Alec MacGillis in The New Yorker. He also
          How  is it that as  Boeing  and  other  companies  have  quotes Gregory Travis, a software engineer and pilot, who
          diversified in areas such as gender and race, they seem not  calls this "a collision of deregulation and Wall Street".
          to have diversified their perspectives, or become any better  While the 737 Max disasters were caused by a software
          at preventing ethical scandals?                     feature, Boeing and regulators initially placed blame on the
                                                              planes' pilots.
          Research by professor in management at Vanderbilt
          University, Jessica Kennedy, has shed further light on Minow's  Do risk assessments unduly focus on the physics of risk
          observations: the more senior you are, the more likely you
                                                              dynamics and thus, chemistry becomes a blindspot? What
          are to justify what the group is already doing - for better or  were the considerations behind the McDonnell Douglas
          worse.  Her  study  of  11,000  employees  across  US
                                                              acquisition? Why was there reckless outsourcing of critical
          government agencies found that senior leadership was  parts of Boeing 787? Many of these risks emanate not from
          almost 64% less likely to speak up against unethical practices
                                                              the shop floor but the boardroom.
          than the most junior employees were.
          Speaking up                                         A fly on the Boeing boardroom wall could be just where to
                                                              begin analysing the information supply chain and spotting
          Even if leaders created the very systems they oversee, they  the signs of groupthink, supplier squeeze and profit over
          become products of them over time. One useful mechanism  safety - hopefully just in time.
          to consider: give a group of younger employees and
          executives an assignment to innovate and challenge the  Courtesy:  The  article  has  been  reproduced  with  the
          existing board. Improved deliberation is certainly an asset,  permission of Mr. Praveen Gupta. The article was contributed
          but a healthy group dynamic is needed to achieve the  by Mr Gupta for the blog of Chartered Insurance Institute
          greatest advantage.                                 Journal, UK.https://thejournal.cii.co.uk/

         26      May 2024     The Insurance Times
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33