Page 358 - Maxwell House
P. 358

338                                                                Chapter 6


        Looking back at Figure 6.1.1c and 6.1.1d, we see that the EM field pattern in coaxial line and
        microstrip is someway similar but not completely matched. If so, we can expect more or less
        reactive energy concentration in the transition area even in the case of equal impedances.  This
        phenomenon is plainly seen in Figure 6.7.7c illustrating the E- and H-field energy distribution.
        Evidently,   >    in the longitudinal gap between the strip and connector body that is
                   
                        
        equivalent to small series inductance. Adjusting the length and size of this gap we can tune the
        transition reaching the broadband performance such way that at the frequency band between 0
        and 10GHz the reflection coefficient does not exceed 0.003.

        6.7.5   Coax-to-Coplanar
        Waveguide Inline Adapter

        Figure 6.7.8 illustrates such transition
        that looks like the same as in Figure
        6.7.7. The main differences are: CPW
        does not  require  the ground metal
        layer (lamination)  on  the  bottom of
        the substrate, the dielectric substrate
        in CPW is  much thicker  (0.381mm
        instead of 0.127mm)  and have the
        higher dielectric constant (10 instead
        of 3)  to diminish the EM energy   Figure 6.7.8 Coax-to-coplanar waveguide inline
        outside infiltration. Besides, the trace   adapter: a) and c) Schematic, b) E- and H-field
        in CPW is wide (0.432mm instead of                   di ib i
        0.254mm) to get the same 50 Ohms characteristic impedance. The protruded coaxial center
        conductor or probe is soldered to the strip as before. There are no vias. Looking back at Figure
        6.1.1d and 6.6.21, we see that the EM field pattern in coaxial line and CPW is similar but not
        completely matched. If so, we can expect some reactive energy concentration in the transition
        area even in the case of equal impedances.  This phenomenon is plainly seen in Figure 6.7.8b
        illustrating the E- and H-field energy distribution in the connection area. Evidently, E-field
        energy is accumulated nearby the coaxial connector while H-field energy spreads along the
        probe. Therefore, the equivalent circuit must be close to depicted in Figure 6.7.5d with  2  ≪
         . At the frequency band between 0 and 10 GHz, the reflection coefficient is not exceed 0.01
         1
                                                                     as shown on Smith
                                                                     chart of Figure
                                                                     6.7.8c.

                                                                     6.7.6     Vertically
                                                                     Mounted  (Right-
                                                                     Angle)   Coaxial
                                                                     Transitions


                                                                     The       inline
                                                                     transitions  like
           Figure 6.7.9 Vertically mounted coaxial transitions: a) Trough-hole,   depicted in Figure
                               b) Surface-mount                      6.7.7 are cheap in
                                                                     production  and

        installation. On the other hand, they are connected straight to thin and quite fragile PCB (printed
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363