Page 360 - Maxwell House
P. 360

340                                                                Chapter 6



        model to run. Advice is simple: google the internet and specialized literature to find something
        close to your vision, then design and run a computer model. Then tune up your model based on
        simulation results.

        The microwave and antenna science  reached  the  level  when practically everything  was
        developed and tested. As such, the real engineering task now is to be able to navigate  the
        enormous  mass of available information.  Finally, you  found something acceptable but for
        different frequency band or not so broadband. If so, the next and most challenging task is the
        frequency scaling.    Sometimes,  but unfortunately  quite seldom,  the  simple changing the
        geometrical  sizes of device  element proportional to frequency shift could  guide  you  to a
        workable model. If not, trust your intuition and carefully analyze simulation results.



        6.8 PROPAGATION EM WAVES IN FERRITE LOADED LINES

        6.8.1   Introduction

        Let us come back to the issue of EM wave propagating in line loaded with magnetized ferrite.
        A broad variety of passive and active, linear and nonlinear devices with unique characteristics
        have been developed since the 1950s when the first nonreciprocal microwave device based on
        the Faraday rotation effect  was built and tested. The  succeeding  efforts have  been  mainly
        directed at improving the properties of existing ferrite and design of a new class of materials
        such as rare-earth iron garnets. The latter possess extremely narrow (< 10 A/m) absorption
        linewidth  (see Figure 2.7.4 of  Chapter 2)  that ensures  a  low  magnetic loss. Note that the
        magnetic loss in  modern  ferrites typically exceeds their dielectric loss.  Another important
        feature of ferrites that keeps them in business is their ability to handle substantial average and
        peak power,  much higher than competing semiconductor elements.  Part of this  may  be
        explained by their high density of ceramic style structure and, as a consequence, decent thermal
        conductivity. The main disadvantages are relatively high material and production cost as well
        the weight of ferrite device due to the presence of bias magnets. Particular attention is required
        to the thermal stability of ferrite devices. Remind those ferrites as a ferro-material gradually
        loses their magnetic properties as the temperature approaches the Curie point shown in Figure
        2.6.1 of Chapter 2. If so, the ferrite devices sometimes require thermostabilization and intensive
        water-cooling  as  well some  system to support them.  Some  concern at high  power  may be
        nonlinearity of spin processing in ferrites mentioned in Chapter 2 and the possible generation
        of the second harmonic of not an acceptable level. It can be an issue for high-power radars
        operating in the environment saturated by many other radio systems.

        We included in the following review the just short description of the most important physical
        phenomenon of EM wave interaction with processing spins and some simplest ferrite devices
        as exemplary. We hope that it will allow the reader to move on him/her own with the minimum
        amount of efforts finding more information in specialized literature [17].

        6.8.2   Faraday Rotation
        This effect discovered by Michal Faraday in 1845 is the result of the interaction of EM waves
        with located in static magnetic or E-field materials like ionospheric plasma in Earth’s magnetic
        field, magnetized ferrites, ferromagnetic semiconductor, etc.  Essentially, Faraday rotation is
   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365