Page 328 - The Social Animal
P. 328

310 The Social Animal


           serve to justify relegating women to traditional stereotyped roles in so-
           ciety. The researchers believe that benevolent sexism is “a particularly
           insidious form of prejudice” because, lacking a tone of hostility toward
           women, it doesn’t seem like a  “prejudice” to men—nor to many
           women, either.

           Feeling Versus Expressing Prejudice Because most of us
           recognize that prejudice is generally frowned upon, we take pains to
           avoid doing or saying things that would appear biased. But the effort
           to suppress what we really feel can be mentally taxing. Thus, when
           our cognitive resources are depleted—if we are tired, angry, stressed,
           distracted, or inebriated—prejudice may leak out. (Mel Gibson’s
           drunken tirade against Jews is a perfect example.) We may also ex-
           press our prejudices in small ways that we have little control over,
           even when we are not tired or drunk. Sometimes, unflattering im-
           ages of other groups pop into our heads and unconsciously influence
           our thoughts and behaviors. My guess is that this is what happened
           to the people who wrote the captions about black hurricane victims
           in New Orleans; their unconscious biases guided their perceptions
           and suggested “looting” as an appropriate caption for blacks, but not
           whites.
               Christian Crandall and Amy Eshleman suggest that most peo-
           ple struggle with the conflict between their urge to express prejudice
           and their need to maintain a positive self-concept (as someone who
           is not a bigot), both in their own eyes, as well as the eyes of others.
           However, as we have seen, it requires energy to suppress prejudiced
           impulses. Because we are programmed to conserve mental energy, we
           are attracted to information that justifies our prejudices. Once we
           find a valid justification for disliking a group, we can express preju-
           dice without feeling like bigots—thus avoiding cognitive dissonance.
           As Crandall and Eshleman put it, “Justification undoes suppression,
           it provides cover, and it protects a sense of egalitarianism and a non-
                                20
           prejudiced self-image.” For example, suppose you dislike gay men
           and lesbians and are inclined to deny them the same rights that het-
           erosexuals enjoy, but you are suppressing those feelings and actions
           because you want to preserve your self-image as a fair-minded per-
           son. How might you avoid the expenditure of all that energy sup-
           pressing your impulse? As a justification for the expression of
           anti-homosexual thoughts and feelings, many people have used the
   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333