Page 329 - The Social Animal
P. 329

Prejudice 311


           Bible. Through the lens of a particular reading of the Bible, an anti-
           gay stance can be defended as fighting for “family values” rather than
           against gays and lesbians. If you are prejudiced against gays, you can
           find justification in the Bible so you still see yourself as a good
           person; but if you are not prejudiced, you can find justification for ac-
           cepting homosexuality in the Bible, too—its preaching of compas-
           sion and love.




           Stereotypes and Prejudice
           At the core of prejudice is the generalization of characteristics, mo-
           tives, or behavior to an entire group of people. This kind of general-
           ization, revealed by General Brown, Richard Nixon, and Mel
           Gibson, is called stereotyping. Journalist and political commentator
           Walter Lippmann, who coined the term, made a distinction between
           the world “out there” and the stereotype—the little pictures in our
           heads that help us interpret the world we see. To stereotype is to
           allow those pictures to dominate our thinking, leading us to assign
           identical characteristics to any person in a group, regardless of the ac-
           tual variation among members of that group. Thus, to believe that
           blacks have a natural sense of rhythm, or Jews are materialistic, or
           women are gullible is to assume that virtually all blacks can dance, or
           that virtually all Jews go around collecting possessions, or that all
           women are unable to think critically. We learn to assign characteris-
                                                            21
           tics to other groups at a very young age. In one study, fifth-grade
           and sixth-grade children were asked to rate their classmates in terms
           of a number of characteristics: popularity, leadership, fairness, and
           the like. The children of upper-class families were rated more posi-
           tively than the children of lower-class families on every desirable
           quality. It seems the youngsters were unable to judge their classmates
           on an individual basis; instead, they had stereotyped them according
           to their social class.
               As we have seen in Chapter 4, stereotyping is not necessarily an
           intentional act of abuse; nor is it always negative. Rather, often it is
           merely a way we humans have of organizing and simplifying the
           complexities of our social world, and we all do it. Stereotyping is in-
           evitable because our evolutionary ancestors needed to be able to
           quickly categorize friends versus foes, members of hostile tribes or
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334