Page 41 - Carbon Frauds and Corruption
P. 41

Corruption of Bribery

                                      Chapter 6 : Corruption in the “Carbon World”


               In plain English this means that even worthless measures are justified if by causing inconvenience
               to citizens they demonstrate political “seriousness”. This is no different from the Bribery Act’s
               concentration on trivia such as hospitality and facilitation payments. The principle seems to be
               that if politicians hyperventilate over the importance of trivia, to cause maximum inconvenience,
               citizens will be impressed and will not complain when power bills increase by 100%. This is known
               in skulduggery circles as "getting your foot in the door".

               An Impact Assessment was signed off by Miliband the Younger, running to 124 pages of
               economic twaddle. There is not a word  about:

                     any benefits from alleged “global warming”
                     the power crisis that will hit the UK post 2015
                     the domination of Russia and China in a post 2015 world
                     the euphemistically labelled carbon leakage and the massive loss of British jobs
                     the impact on the competitiveness of British businesses

               The assessment continues with yet another statement of – as Monty Python would say – “the
               bleedin’ obvious”:

               “The benefits of UK action will be distributed across the globe. In the case where the UK acts in concert with other
               countries then the UK will benefit from other nations’ reduced emissions and would be expected to experience a
               large net benefit. Where the UK acts alone, though there would be a net benefit for the world as a whole, the UK
               would bear the costs of the action and would not experience any benefit from reciprocal reductions elsewhere.
               The economic case for the UK continuing to act alone where global action cannot be achieved would be weak”.
               But you can bet the UK and EU will push ahead even without “global action”; self‐flagellation is
               now in the DNA especially when there is a sniff of a “noble cause” about, the chance to prove
               European superiority and leadership or, more importantly, to raise yet more taxes.

               5.6.2   The Fourth Carbon Budget

               Over 3oo pages of the “Fourth Carbon Budget” (covering the period from 2023 to 2027) were
               published in June 2011 by the Committee on Climate Change (CCC). This is an independent
               statutory body established under the Climate Change Act (2008) “to advise the UK and devolved
               administrative governments in setting and meeting carbon budgets and preparing for climate
               change and to put the UK on trajectory of an 80% reduction by 2050”.

               It is chaired by Lord Adair Turner of Eccinswell (also Chairman of the Financial Services Authority
               and a very busy person), and its membership (consisting  primarily of academics with impressive
               "green" credentials) is  nominated by the British government. It would have been sensible to
               appoint a few sceptics and hard‐nosed business people to the Committee, but that is not the way
               things are done when a “noble cause” is being pursued because you don’t want any dissent.

               To imply that the “budget” is overly complex would be an understatement. In fact, although it
               might be uncharitable to say so, the document gives the impression that it was written with the

               C:\Cobasco\NEW BOOK ON BRIBERY AND CARBON\For Cobasco Web Site Remove Chapters\Chapter 6 Corruption in   23
               the Carbon World for Gower.docx                                 | A SHORT HISTORY OF GLOBAL COOLING
               Warming
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46