Page 297 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 297
Bates no 296
7. From the moment the money was GIFTED it was mine - to with as I
please. He didn't contest this. (Hence when wanting to draw down on
it months later he didn't say it was a TOLATA or LOAN).
8. What I choose the do with the money from there on is MY Choice. I
can give it to charity if I want to. I was the LEGAL owner from Dec
22°d 16 and still am
9. He says in conversation it was from his insiurance money - no one
said it wasn't - but is was no longer his . They do NOT have those
conversations only I do.
10. Tapes - say my house repeatedly- there are many many occasions
when he said this. Just not recorded. It was never up for dispute
11. Legally the house belongs to me - mortgage and deeds joint names
Anthony and me - declaration trust shows ALL monies are mine.
There is NO LEGAL documents for Sig.
12. Will situation - he DID know - he is lying. He did NOT contest it. His
will does NOT mention owning any property nor does it mention
outstanding loans
13. Barrister and COURT was under no illusion it was a GIFT. AS and
barrister under no illusion it was a GIFT. The COURT acting
accordingly
14. The entire future of my kids and me based on the fact it was a GIFT.
Sig did NOT contest this.
15. He contradicts himself- Tolata - loan - tolata - loan - blah blah - it
was a gift
16. Strange to gift large amount - NO - get off books - EGO - loads more
coming - VERY EASY to spend other peoples money - money you
didn't earn and even more if you ill gotten gains!
17. Still acts with no regard for money - yachts - cars - holidays - like a
playboy - still doesn't own a home - just about supports his kids -
barely works even pre lockdown - illusions of grandeur
18. He has not produced one document that shows it's a Tolata or a loan
because he CANT
19. Tried to blackmail into signing "agreements" with a carrot of "lending"
me £50k when he left - knowing he had left me in the lurch