Page 293 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 293

Bates no   292





                MF  I'd have to have a difficult conversation with him regarding the truth of any claim of
                      fraud. I would have to tell him to get criminal advice. If he had done it, I would try to
                      get a deal for him without losing anything. If he hadn't done it, I would say we'll get
                      your money back.

                MC  The email regarding AIG, he has to be honest with the insurance company. I told him,
                      he had to tell me the truth at the time. I think he loses his bottle when it comes to
                      the  final push. I  think he  will  have  told Dawson  Hart  that it is dodgy.  He'll  try to
                      mitigate what he did.


                MF  The most likely set up for the meeting is that we're not all going to be sitting round
                      on one Zoom. I think we'll set up one Zoom for us and another for discussions with
                      Nick, or I can call him via FaceTime.


                MC  Judge Robinson in January was hopeless. Is it too late to go to a private FDR?

                MF  We could try and find someone.


                MC  I don't want to take this to court. If we could get someone to have a private FDR.

                AFS  We haven't exchanged disclosure though.


                MF  That's  right,  we  haven't  exchanged  evidence  and  there  are  questions  regarding
                      criminality. It may not be fruitful to have a private FDR. The allegations of fraud have
                      been made and on the face of it, there is something in it. However, if we don't settle,
                      what next? If we don't want to go to court, then we have to cave in?


                MC  No, if the meeting fails, then we make Josh's specific disclosure application. At the
                      roundtable we can say that the TOLA TA will fail and that he will have to pay Louise's
                      costs of that. If we can draw a line, that's best, settle on the basis that the insurance
                      claims are kosher.

                LS    We don't push for all of these things, but we do want some form of indemnity.


                MC  He can't do that. My belief is that we should get all of these facts out but the alternative
                      course is just to try to settle.


                MF  We can say that he will repay you pound for pound for anything that's taken from you
                      subsequently, although he might not have anything for you to enforce that against.

                LS    I think the EasyJet policy is kosher. We have nothing to say that the £500,000 was all
                      AIG money, it could be made up of a mixture of different claims, some of which were
                      kosher.

                MC  An indemnity by Sig won't help, he may not have the money at the time or he could
                      even be in prison.

                MF  I will reflect and prepare a script for the roundtable. I would expect that he will want
                      a promise from you not to dob him in to the insurers and to repay him pound for
                      pound if he has to repay funds as a result of you doing so.



                2059061.1
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298