Page 266 - MJC submissions

DAS page 36

1. The original application included a plan of the rear of Wealden House (Attachment 6)
which is relevant only to the integrated development and was probably included in error.
The plan misrepresented the WH:LIC boundary in a way that would permit the
development to spill over to land belonging to Ashbourne Park.

The plan has been removed from the substituted application without comment

Submissions to the USA
Viability and deliverability—already claiming a reduction if affordable housing

No track record--- AHL financial strength
Design and access statement and plan--- dodgy explanation--

Inadvertent plan

Outside the built up area…AOANB—and

110== dedman effect at 2.5 per houise
School place

Infrastructure

AECOM report and fight with MSDC not --- (FOI)

parking provisions ASW 21 units with one to 3 minimum of two parking spaces

units with four or more bedrooms a minimum three parking spaces
ignored in the application and supplanted by the WSE cc: parking calculator the result was----

59.2 Site 13
1. The original application to build 71 units on the WH:EDF site is based on four pillars that
are manifestly wrong. The application and supporting documentation state or imply that:
a) The site was supposedly designated in the AW Neighbourhood Plan with a “minimum
expectation” of “50”+ units which was “indicative” of 71;

b) Affordable housing was additional to the 50+ units;
c) The area is “starkly urban” thereby justifying a “utilitarian” design and excessive
density.

This is a circular and fallacious proposition. The only features that might make the existing
site “starkly urban” are the EDF building and Seeboard tower. These are to be removed,
reinstating the site to it strictly rural character.
Removal of the seeboard tower--- emergency services== impact degradation

Owner by GCP--- EDF=- seeboard tower

The integrated development would provide 120 dwellings whereas the legitimate local
demand is minimal. A national property expert described the design of the 71 flats as Page30
“horrible and unsellable” and predicted that most would be transferred to housing

E:\Cobasco\Personal, House and computer instructions\EDF and WH Development\MJC Plans theories and
Objectives\CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSIONS\5 Response to disclosures of 8th December.docx