Page 54 - SKU-000506274_TEXT.indd
P. 54

Tactical implementation plans and tactical objectives

    n Have all business units reported on their contribution to achieving
        the strategy in terms of clear and precise tactical objectives?

    n If all objectives are achieved will the strategy be achieved?
    n Are all tactical plans clearly specific, measurable, achievable,

        realistic and time-framed?
    n All responsibilities clearly allocated including personal and

        departmental accountability, support plans from other
        departments/business units, communication plans, authority levels
        for essential expenditure and feedback, evaluation and review?
    n Have all duplications of responsibility and effort been avoided?
    n At the lowest level is everybody clearly aware of who is to do what,
        with no omissions?

Summary

  I Strategic planning is a business activity. It is not an academic
  I exercise to be played out in ivory towers by specialists who tend
  I toward the predictions only possible in the world of theory. It
  I should be conducted by the top team with inputs from specialists
  I as required. Those HR specialists who suspect, or have good
  I reason to believe, that the standing of their specialism is in decline
  I may wish to consider whether they will prepare themselves for the
  I vital role of “process leaders” as might any other manager with,
  I or capable of attaining, the appropriate skills. Strong process
  I leadership is often essential if the result is to be meaningful.
  I When I was with General Motors I learned the trade of
  I consultant. Whether you choose to use internal or external process
  I skills is a judgement based on the availability of training or talent.
  I Process skills are essential.
  I External or internal consultants can afford to lack neither a
  I detailed knowledge of the strategy nor exactly what questions
  I were asked, and answered, as it was prepared. The well-known
  I capacity of some consultants to do high-quality work in one part of
  I the operation while they ignorantly do harm elsewhere would
  I greatly diminish if all activities were to be judged by asking the
  I question: “What does this contribute to achieving the strategy?”

                                                                                                            The big picture 23
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59