Page 91 - Selling the Invisible: A Field Guide to Modern Marketing - PDFDrive.com
P. 91

A	 wonderfully	 named	 San	 Francisco	 company	 perfectly	 illustrates	 the
Information-per-Inch	Principle—	and	given	its	business,	it	should.	The	company
is	NameLab—a	company	that	specializes	in	naming	products.

   With	lightning	speed,	NameLab’s	name	suggests	the	 company	 takes	a	near-
scientific,	 analytic	 approach	 to	 developing	 names,	 something	 distinct	 in	 its
industry.	 Beyond	 that,	 the	 freshness	 and	 slight	 whimsy	 of	 the	 name	 NameLab
also	 suggests	 the	 company’s	 capacity	 for	 creative,	 right-brain	 thinking.	 So
NameLab	conveys	a	powerful	double	meaning	to	its	prospects,	with	an	excellent
information-per-inch	ratio.

   Ask	yourself:	If	you	needed	a	good	name	for	your	service,	whom	would	you
call	first?	Names	Inc.,	The	Name	Company,	or	NameLab?

   If	 you	were	a	journalist	writing	a	story	 on	product	or	service	names,	which
company	 would	 you	 call	 first?	 (So	 far,	 every	 journalist’s	 answer	 has	 been
NameLab,	as	you	may	have	noticed	in	dozens	of	publications.)

   A	week	later,	which	company’s	name	would	you	remember?
   And	when	that	time	came	to	name	your	company,	which	company	would	you
probably	call	for	help?
   Give	every	name	you	consider	the	Information-per-Inch	Test.

The	Cleverness	of	Federal	Express

	

The	master	packer	of	naming—the	company	that	may	have	squeezed	more	good
information	into	each	inch	of	its	name—is	Federal	Express.

   “Express”	 was	 not	 being	 widely	 used	 when	 Fred	 Smith	 chose	 Federal
Express’s	name.	Thanks	to	its	usage	in	Pony	Express	and	other	places,	“Express”
connotes	“rapid	mail	delivery”—faster	than	conventional	mail.

   Now	 came	 the	 company’s	 next	 question:	 What	 else	 should	 our	 name
communicate?	 “Nationwide,”	 they	 agreed.	 Quickly,	 Smith	 probably	 considered
the	names	National	Express,	Nationwide	Express,	and	US	Express—the	obvious
names	that	come	quickly	to	mind.

   By	contrast,	“federal,”	a	legalistic	term	for	a	political	system	of	states	with	a
central	government,	does	not	come	quickly	to	mind—a	great	asset	in	a	name.	To
give	the	name	even	more	impact	in	the	company’s	competition	with	government
postal	services,

   “federal”	 also	 connotes	 an	 official	 government	 sanction	 or	 status.	 (Smith
admitted	that	he	liked	“Federal”	because	it	sounded	patriotic,	although	his	main
reason	 for	 fixing	 on	 “Federal”	 was	 that	 his	 initial	 business	 plan	 called	 for	 his
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96