Page 107 - The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin_Neat plip book
P. 107

By “carved neural pathways” I am referring  to the  process of creating  chunks
                and  the  navigation  system  between  chunks .  I  am  no t  making  a  literal  phy sical

                description,  so  much  as  illustrating  the  way  the  brain  oper ates.  Le t’s  say  tha t  I
                spend  fifteen  years  studying  chess.  Dur ing  thes e  tho us ands   of  hour s,  my  mind
                is   effectively   cutting   paths   through   the   dense   jungl e   of   chess.   The    jungl e
                analogy    is   a   good   one.   Imagine   ho w   time-cons um ing   it   woul d   be    to   us e   a

                machete  to  cut  your  way  through  thi ck  foliage.  A  few  miles  coul d  take   da ys.
                Once    the   path   is   cleared,   however,   you   coul d   move   qui ckly   thr ough   the
                clearing.   If   you   were   to   make   a   road   and   ride   a   bi ke   or   other    vehi cle,   the
                transportation would get faster still.

                    When  confronted  by  a  new  chess  position,  initially  I  have  to  plod  thr ough
                the  variations.   During  this  process,   I  di scover  organ izing   pr inci ples  and   ne w
                patterns  of  movement.  This  new  inf ormation  gets  systematized  into  a  ne twork
                of  chunks  that  I  can  access  with  increasing   ease  as  my  navigat iona l  func tion

                improves.
                    Now,  let’s  turn  to  the  learning  of  chess  and  see  ho w  thes e  funct ions   really
                operate.   We    will   start   with   day   one.   The   first   thi ng   I   hav e   to   do    is   to
                internalize  how  the  pieces  move.  I  hav e  to  learn   thei r  values.  I  ha ve  to  learn

                how  to  coordinate  them  with  one  ano ther.     Early  on,   thes e  steps  might   seem
                complex.  There  is  the  pawn,  the  kni ght ,  the  bi sho p,  the  rook,  the   que en,  and
                the  king.  Each  piece  is  unique,  with   its  own  strengths  and  weaknesses.  Each
                time  I  look  at  a  chess  piece  I  have  to  remember   what   it  is  and  how  it  moves.

                Then  I  look  at  the  next  piece  and  try  to  remember   how  that   one  moves.  The re
                are   initially   thirty-two   pieces   on   a   ches sbo ard.   To   make   a   respo ns ibl e   che ss
                decision,  I have to look at all those pieces and  check  for captur es,  qui ck  attacks ,
                and other obvious possibilities. By the  time I get  to the  thi rd  pi ece, I’m already

                a bit overwhelmed. By the tenth piece I hav e a headache,          have already  forgo tten
                what I discovered about the first nine  pi eces, and  my oppo nen t is bored.  At thi s
                point I will probably just make a move and bl under .
                    So   let’s   say   that   now,   instead   of   launch ing   from   the   standar d   starting

                position,  we  begin  on  an  empty  bo ard  with  just  a  king   and   a  pawn  aga ins t  a
                king. These are relatively simple pieces. I learn  how they  both  move, and  the n  I
                play  around  with  them  for  a  while  unt il  I  feel  comfortable.  Then ,  over  time,  I
                learn about bishops in isolation,  then  kni ght s,  rooks ,  and  queens .  Soon  eno ugh,

                the  movements  and  values  of  the  chess  pieces  are  nat ur al  to  me.  I  don’t  ha ve  to
                think  about  them  consciously,  but   see  thei r  potential  simul taneous ly  with  the
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112