Page 45 - BPA PPP-Area-V
P. 45

time frames. They are usually broken down into projects that consist of interrelated studies also designed to meet
            predeterminedobjectiveswithin aspecific time frame.Themajorstepsinclude:
                             Identification of strong researchleaders
                                 Thedevelopment of research programs in the University starts with the identification of
                          researchleaderswiththenecessarycompetenciesintermsofknowledge,skills, values and
                          attitudes.
                             Creationof anAdHocCommittee
                                 This will befollowedbycreatinganAdHocCommitteepreferablyof five membersfromthe
                          variousdisciplineswhoshall craft thecommonresearch framework.
                             Appointment of expertstoreview andpackageproposal
                                 ExpertsfromtheUniversityExpertPoolshallthenbesoughttoreviewtheresearchprogram
                          proposalafter whichtheresearchprogramproposalshallbepackagedfirst-class byprovidingallthe
                          neededinformationfordonorsupport.
                             Invitation of prospective funddonors
                                  Prospectivedonorsshallthenbeinvited for avisit andbriefingaboutthe program.
            Thesameprocessshallalsobesoughtfor sponsor-driven programproposals.


                Criteriain EvaluatingR&DProposals
            Following aresomeconsiderationsundereachcriterionto evaluatetheProjectsproposals:


            1)Tangible Impact on Improving Quality of Academic Programs. The extent to which the proposal is expected
            to bringdirectbenefitsto the policyformulationaimedatimprovingquality ofacademicprogram;
            2)Multidisciplinary Approach. The involvement of proponents coming from different disciplines is given preference
            in theevaluationofproposals;ThepartnershipofseniorandJuniorresearchers(mentor-menteerelationships)is also
            desirable.
            3) Clarityand Manageability. The proposal should be clear, concise and implementable within the period as
            proposed.Amongthe desirablecharacters shouldbe:
                             Keyactivities of the projectandtimefor eachareclearlyoutlinedin the proposal.
                             Attainableoutcomeresults(longterm) andoutputresults (short termorimmediate)
                             Realisticperformancemeasurement indicators
                             Smallscaleandshortprojectcycle (ableto demonstrateresultswithin shorterperiod)
            4) Sustainability, Replication and Up-scaling. The extent to which the expected results of the proposal have the
            potentials to bereplicatedorup-scaledin largerscale,in anothergeographicregionor inother context.
            5) Realistic andRelevantBudget.Amongtheseshouldinclude:
                         Theextent to whichthe proposedbudgetis realistic.
                         Theextent to whichthe proposedbudgetitemsarerelevant.


            Evaluation of theProposals
                       Projectsideallyshouldcoverone-yearimplementationperiod.Allproposalswill bereviewedbyacampus
            committee designated. Consolidated proposals by campus will be endorsed and submitted to the University level for
            final review and approval by a committee to be designated by the VP-RDET. Evaluation team in the campus and
            university level canmakeuseof the setofevaluation criteria asmentionedabove.
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50