Page 140 - FULL REPORT 30012024
P. 140

Table 5.2 Result of Evaluation Metrics

                                               Metrics                     Result
                                               Accuracy                    80%

                                               Precision                   75%

                                               Recall                      90%

                                               F1 Score                    82%



                                 The  evaluation  metrics  of  the  prediction  model  yielded  notable  results,
                                 providing  insight  into  its  predictive  capabilities.  The  model  achieved  an

                                 accuracy rate of 80%, indicating that it correctly predicted stroke outcomes

                                 80% of the time. In terms of precision, the model scored 75%, meaning that
                                 among all the positive predictions for stroke, 75% were accurate. The recall

                                 metric  was  particularly  high  at  90%,  signifying  that  the  model  was

                                 successful in identifying 90% of all actual positive stroke cases. Lastly, the
                                 F1  score,  which  serves  as  a  balance  between  precision  and  recall,  was

                                 calculated to be 82%. This score reflects the model's overall efficiency in
                                 minimizing  both  false  positives  and  false  negatives,  underscoring  its

                                 effectiveness in stroke risk prediction.



                        5.2     User Acceptance Testing (UAT)




                                 The web-based application for stroke risk assessment was evaluated using

                                 User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and the  Technology Acceptance Model
                                 (TAM)  as  essential  approaches.  UAT  was  used  to  directly  evaluate  the

                                 feasibility  and  user-friendliness  of  the  application  in  real-life  situations,
                                 guaranteeing that the final product meets the anticipated requirements and

                                 preferences of its target users. The practical testing method facilitated the
                                 collection of specific comments on the application's performance and user

                                 interface. Conversely, the TAM framework offered a theoretical foundation

                                 for examining user acceptability, with a particular emphasis on perceived
                                 utility and ease of use as crucial factors in the uptake of technology. The

                                 integration of UAT and TAM provided a thorough comprehension of both
                                                               123
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145