Page 145 - FULL REPORT 30012024

score of 4, and seven responses with a score of 5. The application's

efficacy in facilitating health management choices had an average rating

of 4.30. There were no respondents who rated it with a score of 1 or 2, 3
respondents who gave it a score of 3, 15 respondents who rated it with a

score of 4, and 12 respondents who gave it a score of 5. The application's
contribution to proactive stroke risk management received an average

score of 4.23. There were no replies indicating a score of 1 or 2, 4

responses indicating a score of 3, 15 responses indicating a score of 4, and
11 responses indicating a score of 5. Finally, the perceived value of stroke

risk predictions in healthcare routines received an average score of 4.20.
There were no replies with a score of 1, one response with a score of 2,

three responses with a score of 3, fifteen responses with a score of 4, and

eleven responses with a score of 5.

ii. Perceived Ease of Use (PEU)

This section shows the result of user evaluation for the Perceived Ease of

Use (PEU) of the web application. It focuses on user perceptions of the
application's usability, including interface design, navigability, and

intuitiveness. Table 5.5 shows the summary of the questionnaire section
on perceived ease of use.

Table 5.5 Summary of Perceive Ease of Use Responses
No Questions Respondents count Average

in each Score
1 2 3 4 5
1 It is easy for me to use the features of the 0 0 2 15 13 4.37
web application.

2 The web application is user-friendly. 0 0 1 14 15 4.47
3 Using this web application makes it easy 0 1 3 12 15 4.4
for me to understand stroke and its risks.
4 The user interface of the web application 0 0 3 13 14 4.37

is intuitive for navigating and obtaining
information.

128