Page 717 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

sur prise, wor ry or make plans? What un con scious
phe nom e non could make hu man be ings ca pa ble of
tak ing in stant and log i cal de ci sions in mo ments of

dif fi cul ty? Could the un con scious at oms in the brain
pos si bly turn an an i mal in to a hu man who con -
structs sky scrap ers, makes air planes, man u fac tures
com put ers, voy ag es in to space by dis cov er ing and

solv ing math e mat i cal for mu lae and who de signs ro bots
re sem bling him self?
How could a bac te ri um have de vel oped in to hu man be -
ings who have found ed glo ri ous civ il i za tions all over the

world and pro duced such ex traor di na ry tech nol o gies?
Evolutionary the o re ti cians need to an swer all these
ques tions, and more. They must ex plain how co in ci den ces
and ran dom, un con scious ef fects gave rise to con scious ness.

They should ac count for how un con scious events be haved in a
man ner su pe ri or to con scious ness it self and ex hib it ed more in tent than
many a con scious en ti ty. If ev o lu tion tru ly took place, they would first have to come up with sup port -
ing sci en tif ic ev i dence and then re solve all these il log i cal i ties. But have ev o lu tion ists been able to bring

a sci en tif ic ex pla na tion to bear? Do they have a so lu tion to the di lem ma of how un con scious events
bring about con scious ness? Have any of these ques tions been ex plained in the count less ev o lu tion ist
books that have been writ ten, in count less ev o lu tion ist ar ti cles and con fer en ces? No!
All ev o lu tion ists can do is to list their var i ous claims, adorn these with fine words, avoid pro duc -

ing any ev i dence, and use long but hol low words to in doc tri nate as many oth ers as pos si ble with the
idea that man is es sen tial ly an an i mal. In the same way that they can not pro duce any sci en tif ic ev i -
dence, so they are un a ble to re solve the ac com pa ny ing log i cal con fu sion. Consciousness is one of those
proofs that de mol ish the the o ry of ev o lu tion, a de fin i tive and ir ref u ta ble fact that leaves Darwinists in

a state of ut ter de spair. The lies that Darwinists have made about mat ter can not be ap plied to the sub -
ject of con scious ness. This the o ry, de vel oped on the ba sis of the ex is tence of sole ly mat ter, is re fut ed
in the face of this in tan gi ble ev i dence. This lie, launched in or der to de ny the ex -
is tence of Allah, has been de mol ished by con scious ness, one of the su preme

works of Allah. In one verse, He tells us that:
They con coct ed their plots, but their plots were with Allah, even if they were such
as to make the moun tains van ish. (Qur’an, 14:46)

Adnan Oktar 715