Page 718 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Are Darwinists aware that they have souls?

Modern sci ence has con firmed that hu man in tel li gence does not stem from ex chan ges be tween brain
cells, as ma te ri al ists long main tained. To put it an oth er way, there is a pres ence in each hu man body that

is not the prod uct of that body’s func tions and has no cor po re al na ture. The the o ry of ev o lu tion—the
prod uct of ma te ri al ist phi los o phy that ac cepts no ac counts apart from the ab so lute ex is tence of mat ter—
is at a to tal loss in the face of the hu man soul, which lacks any ma te ri al ex is tence.

To re mind you, not one sin gle ev o lu tion ist claim re gard ing the de vel op ment of life forms has ev er
been prov en, nor has ev i dence ev er been pro duced for any of them. The the o ry of ev o lu tion has mere ly
re sort ed to spec u la tions about nat u ral his to ry, em ployed false ev i dence and ig nored the sci en tif ic and
pale on to log i cal facts that prove that spe cies nev er evolved. It has tried to mis lead peo ple by por tray ing
fos sil spec i mens as in ter me di ate forms—prop a gan da whose in va lid i ty has since been re al ized—and

even re sort ed to hoax es to that end. (For de tailed in for ma tion see The Transitional Form Dilemma by
Harun Yahya.)
Evolutionists have count less sce nar i os and tall tales re gard ing the sup posed ev o lu tion of liv ing

things. Yet not a sin gle one of these has been sci en tif i cal ly prov en, even while sci ence and tech nol o gy
have clear ly de clared the im pos si bil i ty of such ev o lu tion.
Among these in sol u ble di lem mas fac ing the the o ry of ev o lu tion, what makes the sub ject of con -
scious ness spe cial is the way that ev o lu tion ists have been un a ble to in vent any sce nar i os on the sub ject,
much less ex plain it in terms of any phys i cal ev i dence. Advanced scan ning de vi ces, the pro ducts of

mod ern tech nol o gy, have dashed ma te ri al ists’ ex pec ta tions of any re gion or proc ess in the brain that
gives rise to in tel li gence. No ma te ri al ist ac count of hu man in tel li gence has been pro duced.
The rea son why ma te ri al ist mind sets en gage in such quests is the fail ure to un der stand the true con -

cept of con scious ness. Failing to un der stand that they have a soul, they do not act in the aware ness of
that fact—which is the sole rea son for their es pous al of Darwinism. Were they aware of the ex traor di na -
ry na ture of their own con scious ness—an en tire ly met a phys i cal re al i ty—they would re al ize that they
pos sess a soul and it would be im pos si ble for them to be Darwinists.
Darwinists main tain that the hu man ey e’s ir re du ci ble com plex i ty evolved by chance, and that hu -

man be ings al so de vel oped their vi sion by chance. They re gard hu man be ings, who see col ors, are able
to per ceive their sur round ings and to in ter pret them, as the end prod uct of co in ci den tal in ter ac tions be -
tween cells. They claim that the cells of the eye catch ing the light out side and the ex is tence of the brain

are enough to let us per ceive a bright ly col ored world. Yet they fail to un der stand that this or gan must
open and close, de tect and per ceive im a ges, make con scious de ci sions of where to look and, in short, be -
have in ac cord ance with the dic tates of the soul.
No Darwinist ad mits to sens ing the con scious ness with in him. It is im pos si ble to feel it and still re -
main a Darwinist. It is im pos si ble to claim that this con scious ness with in con sists sole ly of a col lec tion

of cells that reached this lev el by de vel op ing from a bac te ri um and that ev ery thing one pos sess es and
per ceives is the prod uct of un con scious co in ci den ces. It is im pos si ble to main tain this with a nor mal con -
science and con scious ness. Darwinists are un a ware that in side them is an en ti ty that sees, thinks, rea -

sons, in ter prets, loves, re joic es and grieves. The mo ment they do be come aware of it, they im me di ate ly
aban don as crib ing di vine pow ers to mat ter.
Our abil i ty to recog nize some one ap proach ing and be ing de light ed to see them are no longer mat -
ters in volv ing sci ence. They are facts that go be yond phys ics and can not be ex plained in terms of any
phys i cal or ma te ri al struc ture. It is im pos si ble for any one aware of the con scious ness in side them to

claim that mat ter is the ab so lute be-all and end-all. For that rea son, Darwinists have de vel oped a com -
plete ly sep a rate con cep tu al struc ture, and mode of per cep tion. There is no doubt that it is Allah Who
best knows the truth of this.

Allah has told us in the Qur’an that even if they wit ness mir a cles, such peo ple will still fail to be -
lieve:

716 Atlas of Creation Vol. 4