Page 16 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend
P. 16

The Cambrian Evidence That Darwin Failed to Comprehend

                  years? Evolutionists cannot offer any logical scenario to answer that
                  question.
                       Many of the facts revealed by science are by themselves sufficient
                  to demolish the theory of evolution. However, one piece of evidence
                  demolishes the very foundations of the theory and poses practically
                  every question that Darwinists cannot explain—namely, the variety
                  and complexity of life, exhibited with such magnificence all over the
                  world, some 530 million years ago.
                       The eyeball, for which evolutionists attempt to account with de-
                  velopmental scenarios, existed in all its complexity at a time when, ac-
                                            cording to evolutionists themselves, no
                                               “eye-like” organs should have existed.
                                                   In an environment in which only
                                                     single-celled organisms had ex-
                                                      isted, a wealth of highly com-
                                                      plex living species suddenly
                                                      came into being, with no trace
                                                      at all of any supposed forerun-
                                                        ners, as if to provide living
                                                         proof to refute the theory of
                                                           evolution.
                                                                So persuasive is the
                                                            fossil record, and so
                                                            compelling is this phe-
                                                            nomenon from evolu-
                                                            tionists’ point of view,
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21