Page 141 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

Darwinists never consider that buttons carved out of bone
used circa 10,000 BCE are evidence that the people of that time wore so-
phisticated clothing culture, and that any culture that employed but-
tons must also have known about sewing and weaving.
Darwinists never consider how a 95,000-year-old flute is proof
that people living tens of thousands of years ago appreciated music,
and that there is no such thing as primitive man
Darwinists never consider how people of circa 10,000 BCE

used copper implements, indicating that therefore, their society must
have known about smelting and have had the technical know-how to
extract copper from rock and then work it.
Darwinists never consider how the smooth finish on the sur-
face of stones—from what they describe as from the Stone Age and
claim to be the products of a primitive culture—is not the result of pol-
ish, because polish cannot survive intact for thousands of years. This

patina was produced by using steel tools on the surface of the rock—a
task requiring great skill.
Darwinists never question how a metal bowl was crafted from
an alloy of zinc and silver 100,000 years ago, as reported in Scientific
American magazine in 1852. The bouquets of flowers, bunches of grapes
and other designs on it are the product of an advanced artistry. Clearly,
the people who produced that alloy had developed a culture capable of
working metal.
Darwinists never consider that a temperature of 1,084.5oC is

needed to extract molten metal turn copper ore, that bellows or some
other device is essential to ensure a flow of air during that process. A
kiln must be constructed to maintain such a temperature, and that tools
such as ladles and tongs to extract the metal from the kiln must also be
in existence. For these reasons, people who lived in the past can in no
way be regarded as primitive. (Also see Harun Yahya, A Historical Lie:
The Stone Age, Istanbul: Global Publishing, 2006.)

139