Page 223 - The Danger of a Communist Kurdistan

in a state of fear in a climate of violence, the communists make use of
that fear; they are very well aware that communism can never come to
power by democratic means. And there has never been any effort to try
to bring communism to power by democratic means. Communism has
always come to power through violence. As a result, communism
never, ever regards peace as a method worth pursuing. And as a result
of that, the PKK also engages in the politics of violence.

The Turkish government and the Turkish people have to under-
stand what this terrorist separatist organization really wants in order
to eliminate this threat of terror and prevent a communist uprising in

Southeast Turkey. If the PKK is given any area of territory, it will try
to use the "revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat" established
there in order to survive, expand, strengthen and grow in all areas by
applying violence against the middle class and thus the state.
According to the communist mindset, all wealthy people, religious
believers, soldiers, police, intellectuals, teachers, lawyers, doctors,
engineers, scientists and writers are part of the "bourgeois class" in

question. Therefore, this communist state they want to see established
will only survive so long as all intellectuals are suppressed. The same
policy as that adopted by Pol Pot will be implemented, and the entire
people will be subjected to oppression, violence and terror.

Let us here have a look at the kind of results an organization based
on the ideas of Lenin, whom we have already quoted, can give rise to:
the autonomous state that will arise in the event the land demanded by
the PKK in Southeast Turkey is given will be "maintained through the
use of violence by the proletariat against the bourgeoisie," as Lenin
said. And since it is "unrestricted by any laws," it will be a state entire-
ly based on violence and that will attach no value to the laws of the

Turkish state. Therefore, any autonomous Kurdish state established
there must be regarded as a purely symbolic one. They will regard
being run by a Turkish state from Ankara as a purely transitional stage;

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) 221