Page 200 - Darwin's Dilemma: The Soul
P. 200

Darwin’s Dilemma: The Soul

                     It is hard to accept the evolution of the human eye as a product of
                     chance; it is even harder to accept the evolution of human intelli-
                     gence as the product of random disruptions in the brain cells of our
                     ancestors.  126
                     Darwinists must have realized that their claims regarding the
                evolution of human consciousness, based solely upon interpreta-
                tion, were inadequate, inasmuch as they felt the need to dress the
                matter up with scientific terminology. They therefore suggested a
                concept they called “the phenomenon of emergence,” which, they
                claimed, played a role.
                     According to Darwinists, a pure chance phenomenon could
                lead to the unexpected emergence of something else. They claimed
                that water was a classic scientific example. On their own, hydrogen
                and oxygen do not bear any water-like characteristics, but the wa-
                ter molecules that emerge when these chemicals are combined in a
                specific ratio exhibit properties that could not have been predicted
                beforehand, from either gas. Evolutionists sought to apply this
                chemical observation to the subject of human consciousness, claim-
                ing that some random change in the chemistry of the brain lay at
                the root of human consciousness. This hypothesis—completely
                untestable and for which there is no scientific evidence—was a
                clear indication of the despairing position in which they found
                themselves. This exceedingly illogical claim is of course technical-
                ly impossible. As everyone is perfectly well aware, human con-
                sciousness is not a phenomenon linked to physical laws in the
                same way that water is. The way you can imagine the appearance,
                smell and taste of a strawberry or the faces and voices of your rel-
                atives as if they were present is not, of course, the result of the at-
                  oms in your brain producing something that was hitherto un-
                  known. The perception of all these things happens of your voli-
                  tion, and is something you are thinking about at that moment.
                      It is impossible for physical atoms and molecules with






                                            198
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205